Search for: "State v. Haas"
Results 161 - 180
of 196
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2010, 4:39 am
Delaware Chancery Court Finally Rules in Selectica Below is news from Steven Haas of Hunton & Williams (we are posting memos analyzing this decision in our DealLawyers.com "Poison Pills" Practice Area): On Friday, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued its long-awaited opinion in Selectica v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 9:10 am
Ono v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Haas Professor in Corporate Finance Law, Emeritus Harvard Law School Richard Buxbaum J.D. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
During debates, state Democrats argued that the bill is intended to challenge Arizona v. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court case, Christie v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 11:00 pm
Behrend v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 5:46 am
I went back 99 years to Haas v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 8:23 am
The following is from an excellent SIFMA presentation provided by Wayne Carlin and Cheryl Haas. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:25 am
Supreme Court decision, Carcieri v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube patent suit… [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
A panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision yesterday in Big Lagoon Rancheria v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 4:30 am
Piacentile v. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 5:59 am
" -- Mark Adler, Chief IP Counsel, Rohm and Haas Company "The process of quality examination begins with the applicant. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 5:39 am
Serio, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, on Tuesday, September 3, 2019 Tags: Appraisal rights, Delaware cases, Erica John Fund v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 4:56 pm
S___ K___ v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 11:26 am
In the past, of course, the agencies have stated that “the vast majority of mergers are either procompetitive and enhance consumer welfare or are competitively benign”[5] and that “[m]ergers are one means by which firms can improve their ability to compete. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:46 am
Although it has been admitted by the NIKE legal representatives that Kawhi Leonard had submitted a design, they have gone on to state that it is a false claim that the design was the “Claw” design, as reported in the Bulletin. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 6:04 am
Tørsløv and Ludvig S. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:50 am
That was the issue in the unreported (non-precedential) decision in the case of Traynor n/k/a Dallara v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:10 am
Haas and David C. [read post]
