Search for: "State v. London"
Results 161 - 180
of 3,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2016, 2:29 am
In Mr Samin’s case the Court of Appeal upheld the Central London County Court ruling affirming Westminster City Council’s decision stating that he was “a person from abroad who is not eligible for housing assistance” within the meaning of the Housing Act, s 185(1), because he did not have the right of residence in the UK under the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2006. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 6:09 am
City of New London. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 5:22 am
The House of Lords considered the effect of s 17(1) in Din (Taj) v Wandsworth LBC [1983] 1 AC 657, HL. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 12:23 pm
The topic is my work on Kelo v. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 4:01 pm
Penney “‘Zeran v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm
A very welcome guest report on this s.204 Housing Act 1996 Appeal by Alice Hilken of 1 Pump Court, who acted for the appellant, instructed by Rahman & Co.Kumaning v London Borough of Haringey December 2011, Central London County Court, HHJ SaggersonThe Appellant (A) was a British Citizen of Ghanaian origin who had lived in the U.K for over 15 years. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 1:25 pm
A very welcome guest report on this s.204 Housing Act 1996 Appeal by Alice Hilken of 1 Pump Court, who acted for the appellant, instructed by Rahman & Co.Kumaning v London Borough of Haringey December 2011, Central London County Court, HHJ SaggersonThe Appellant (A) was a British Citizen of Ghanaian origin who had lived in the U.K for over 15 years. [read post]
25 Jan 2009, 6:22 am
Back from a week in London. [read post]
13 May 2011, 4:16 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) K v L [2011] EWCA Civ 550 (13 May 2011) AXA Sunlife Services Plc v Campbell Martin Ltd & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 549 (12 May 2011) BDW Trading Ltd (t/a Barratt North London) v JM Rowe (Investments) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 548 (12 May 2011) AP (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 551 (12 May 2011) Kennedy v The Information Commissioner & Anor [2011] EWCA… [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:14 am
Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 6:14 am
Supreme Court’s 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 2:37 am
Corp. v. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 2:23 am
On appeal from: [2018] EWCA Civ 844 This appeal considered whether a condition restricting the use of the premises should be implied into a planning permission granted by the appellant; alternatively, whether the planning permission should be interpreted as containing such a condition. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 10:37 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) McNeill, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 553 (27 February 2008) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Mamki, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 307 (08 April 2008) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Gentoo Group Ltd & Anor v Hanratty [2008] EWHC 627 (QB) (07 April 2008) High Court (Administrative Court) The Mayor of London, R (on the application of) v… [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 9:24 am
Two pieces in the news worth noting on the issue of secrecy v. transparency in the U.S. intelligence world. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:04 am
HHJ Faber at Central London County Court allowed the tenant’s appeal, apparently on the basis that there was a deposit paid in relation to the premises and there was a post April 2007 tenancy agreement stating that a deposit had been paid in respect of that tenancy. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 3:56 am
City of New London. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 1:39 am
There were several charterparties all of which contained London arbitration clauses. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 6:07 am
This was just one of the many questions dealt with by Mr Justice Arnold in The London Taxi Corporation Limited trading as the London Taxi Company v (1) Frazer-Nash Research Limited and (2) Ecotive Limited [2016] EWHC 52 (Ch). [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 3:35 am
Applicant rejected after being found overqualified for appointment to the positionCity of New London v Harrigan, CA2*May an individual be so overqualified for the position so as to justify his or her being rejected for an appointment to the title? [read post]
