Search for: "State v. Parish"
Results 161 - 180
of 803
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2012, 5:21 am
The Louisiana Court of Appeal agreed with the district court's decision to dismiss some of Alan's claims in Kite v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:26 am
In the 2018 case, Murphy v. [read post]
14 Aug 2017, 7:56 am
Guidry v. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 11:37 am
In Hoffman v. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 11:05 am
The irony in relying on Jones v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 10:01 pm
Citing Doerr v. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 7:17 am
The case is The Parish of Plaquemines v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 8:00 am
Orleans Parish School Board: The Desegregation of New Orleans Public SchoolsU.S. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 1:45 pm
With Williams v. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:55 am
In ETC Tiger Pipeline LLC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2019, 9:30 am
Having no idea of just how many South Carolina parishes had done so (because the evidence of individual parish consents -- such as may have existed -- was not in the record before the Supreme Court), the justices simply lifted a number out of ECUSA's brief to that court, and duly assumed that 29 parishes had "acceded" in writing to the Dennis Canon, and so were bound by the trust it imposed. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 1:42 pm
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2021-2022update.htmlSix petitions for certiorari were denied on 1/10/22: Parish v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 4:00 am
In Azige v. [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 4:05 am
In Rehfield v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:34 pm
And as Judge Dixon is now finding out, that representation by ECUSA's attorneys was wrong.According to the papers filed by Mark Lawrence's attorneys with Judge Dixon, not a single plaintiff parish ever signed a document stating that they expressly agreed to the trust which the Dennis Canon attempted to impose. [read post]
21 May 2021, 4:05 am
In Belya v. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 4:05 am
In DP (a pseudonym) v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:30 am
Hood v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
Elwood Breaux Jr. v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 4:00 am
DOT & Dev. v. [read post]
