Search for: "State v. Patton" Results 161 - 180 of 208
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Dec 2010, 11:21 am by Aaron
Louthan should have been allowed to raise the issue of the search incident to arrest, and that search was illegal under Patton and Valdez. http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/38472-8.10.doc.pdf State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:20 pm
 As the feature explains: "A closely watched trial in federal court in Atlanta, Cambridge University Press et al. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am by John Elwood
(relisted after the June 13 conference)   Patton v. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:01 am by Ben
Archer claims that his novel Not a Penny More, Not a Penny Less  was turned into the 2011 romantic comedy hit Ladies v Ricky Bahl, and that Archer's Kane & Abel became the film Khudgarz. [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 3:24 am
Attorney for the State: Joby Jerrells, Indianapolis, IN. 9:45 AM - Brenwick Associates, LLC v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 10:25 am by Jonathan Bailey
Let me know via Twitter @plagiarismtoday. 1: Appeals Court Reverses GSU Copyright Ruling First off today, Andrew Albanese at Publishers Weekly reports that the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has overturned a lower court ruling in the George State e-reserve case (Cambridge University Press v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 8:55 am by Beth Graham
Albert, 354 S.W.3d 368, 375 (Tex. 2011) (jurisdiction as to claim lost when claim timely non-suited); Patton Boggs LLP v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 5:27 am
 The second is whether diverging legal frameworks between Member States hamper the principle of free movement of goods. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
I don’t know if I’m surprised by the result of the opinion, but an opinion that interested me lately was an Oregon Supreme Court decision entitled Patton v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The Appellate Division routinely holds that an equity owner’s loss of historic management or control rights in a closely-held business is precisely the sort of intangible, un-quantifiable loss that qualifies as “irreparable,” warranting injunctive relief: Cooperstown Capital, LLC v Patton, 60 AD3d 1251 [3d Dept 2009] [“The possibility of plaintiff losing any real say” in the business, and the “opportunity for defendants to shift the balance of… [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:49 am by Adrian Lurssen
Sutherland in Upstart Business Journal/Portfolio.com: Kickstarter Turns Crowdfunding Up To 11 Patton Boggs in Revolution Analytics’ Revolutions: EU court’s SAS ruling conflicts with Oracle v Google McDermott Will & Emery in WSJ’s Corruption Currents: High Tide: From Wal-Mart Testing Corporate Citizenship To Being Unfit For Command Reed Smith on Lenders 360: Why Do Lenders Disdain Bankruptcy Court? [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 1:09 pm by Bexis
You betcha.In state after state, whether product liability is common-law or statutory, and whether it’s based on the Second or Third Restatement, courts have refused to allow plaintiffs to make claims asserting that legal products should not have been sold at all. [read post]