Search for: "State v. Servantes"
Results 161 - 180
of 1,183
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2013, 4:00 am
Clearly "A public employer may abolish civil service positions for the purpose of economy or efficiency, as long as the position is not abolished as a subterfuge to avoid statutory protection afforded civil servants before they are discharged. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:16 am
In People v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 4:15 am
In İzzettin Doğan and Others v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 10:30 pm
We missed this one in 2019, when Arvind Elangovan (Wright State University) published Norms and Politics: Sir Benegal Narsing Rau and the Making of the Indian Constitution, 1935-50 with Oxford University Press. [read post]
31 Jul 2024, 11:57 am
Trump one piece of advice, it would be this: “Fire every single midlevel bureaucrat, every civil servant in the administrative state. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:33 am
Reed v. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:07 pm
) [1] Maulvi Tamizuddin Khan v Federation of Pakistan and ors 1954 SHC 81. [2] See e.g. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:27 am
Nelson By: Jillian Kornblatt On January 19, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of NASA v. [read post]
6 Apr 2017, 7:00 am
Dist. of Middletown N.Y. v Civil Serv. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 7:16 am
Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 10:42 am
Elsevier submits that if Pearson believed that their copyright was being infringed upon by it, then the right way forward for Pearson was to seek civil remedy for infringement of copyright.Pearson responded by stating that Elsevier's petition suffered from the vice of mala fide as it was filed deliberately in collusion with Sanguine and its partners. [read post]
Washington State Supreme Court Orders Disclosure of Investigative Reports Alleging Police Misconduct
19 Aug 2011, 10:37 am
” Bellevue John Does 1-11 v. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 7:20 am
Lilly v. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:40 am
Andrew Crosbie v Secretary of State for Defence [2011] EWHC 879 (Admin) – Read judgment The Administrative Court has ruled that the employment of an army chaplain involves a “a special bond of trust and loyalty” between employee and state such that the full panoply of fair trial rights under Article 6 could not apply. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm
A three-judge panel agreed in Mandel v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 10:20 am
FOUR lawyers in THREE different law firms in THREE different states. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 1:15 pm
We previously wrote about the Indiana Court of Appeals decision in Arrendale v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 7:50 am
Last week in Matter of Phillips v Ramsey, 2007 NY Slip Op 06045, the Second Department held that a state trooper's personal copy of a police training manual does not constitute Brady material. [read post]
