Search for: "State v. Silvas"
Results 161 - 180
of 351
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2017, 5:30 pm
Silva v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:16 pm
Craig Silva and Patrick J. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:04 am
Carter, Jr. upheld Magistrate Judge Andrew Peck’s order in Da Silva Moore, et. al. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2022, 10:33 am
He emphasized that after “[v]erifying that that content has been repeated, there will be no need for a new representation or judicial decision, there will be an extension and immediate withdrawal of these fraudulent news. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:34 am
As Annsley explains in this post, that litigation started back in 2012 and focuses on an exciting Rovi's patent - European Patent (UK) No 0, 862,833 - which relates to interactive video communications and viewer-controlled selection of programming information.* Jeremy Phillips' words of warning- and some further thoughtsStarting from Jeremy's words at the 10th anniversary JIPLP program, Neil reflects on the state of IP in the universities. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:57 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York approved the use of predictive coding in Monique Da Silva Moore, et al. v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:03 am
While the DeCaro defendants contend that a rescission defense based on unilateral mistake would not have been successful in the underlying action for specific performance, specific performance may be denied based on unilateral mistake [*4]where the other party must have been aware of the mistake (see Da Silva v Musso, 53 NY2d 543, 548; Sheridan Drive-In v State of New York, 16 AD2d 400, 405; Harper, Inc. v City of Newburgh, 159 App Div 695, 696-697). [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 4:22 am
State Farm Mut. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 10:52 pm
Village of Port Chester - "conspicuous mention" of time limitations in eminent domain Silva v. [read post]
25 Feb 2012, 6:01 pm
Peck, United States Magistrate Judge for the Southern District of New York, issued an opinion and order (order) on February 24th in Da Silva Moore v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
See Larkin v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:46 am
Silva (1931) 116 Cal.App. 1). [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 7:08 pm
A prompt, thorough, and fair investigation conducted in good faith can insulate an employer from liability for wrongful termination (see Cotran v Rollins Hudig Hall Int’l, Inc. (1998) 17 Cal.4th 93; Silva v Lucky Stores, Inc. (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 256, improve employee morale, and prevent further harassment or discrimination from occurring. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 8:08 pm
A prompt, thorough, and fair investigation conducted in good faith can insulate an employer from liability for wrongful termination (see Cotran v Rollins Hudig Hall Int’l, Inc. (1998) 17 Cal.4th 93; Silva v Lucky Stores, Inc. (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 256, improve employee morale, and prevent further harassment or discrimination from occurring. [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 7:08 pm
A prompt, thorough, and fair investigation conducted in good faith can insulate an employer from liability for wrongful termination (see Cotran v Rollins Hudig Hall Int’l, Inc. (1998) 17 Cal.4th 93; Silva v Lucky Stores, Inc. (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th 256, improve employee morale, and prevent further harassment or discrimination from occurring. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
A showing of "good cause" generally requires intentional wrongdoing or, at least, a showing that petitioners were aggrieved or prejudiced by the violation (see Matter of Fichera v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
A showing of "good cause" generally requires intentional wrongdoing or, at least, a showing that petitioners were aggrieved or prejudiced by the violation (see Matter of Fichera v New York State Dept. of Envtl. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 3:41 pm
A recent case, Kennestone Hospital, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 6:00 am
R (DA & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (expedited) was heard on 17 until 19 July 2018. [read post]
