Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor" Results 161 - 180 of 4,472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2017, 8:11 am by Daily Record Staff
., Substitute Trustees, 1 initiated foreclosure proceedings as to a residential property owned by Paul Taylor, Jr. and Cheryl Taylor (“the Taylors”) in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 4:04 am
Alleged violations of a "Memorandum of Understanding" to a Taylor Law agreement may not be subject to contract grievance proceduresPine Plains CSD v Federation of Teachers, 248 A.D.2d 612It is not unusual for parties to a collective bargaining agreement to agree to provisions set out in a “supplemental agreement” or to sign a “memorandum of understanding” in the course of collective bargaining pursuant to the Taylor Law.Typically this… [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 2:57 pm
Trent Taylor's article discusses the implications of the district court ruling in North Carolina v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 3:50 am
Union rather than officers or board members to acknowledge it does not assert the right to violate the Taylor Law New York City Tr. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Viruet v City of New York , 97 NY2d 171, the Appellate Division explained that as the Taylor Law is incorporated into the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation Act and the exemptions in the Act are substantially consistent with Article 14 of the Civil Service, "the override provision of Unconsolidated Laws §7405(5) does not apply" in this instance.Noting that the exclusions for managerial and confidential employees are an exception to the… [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Citing Viruet v City of New York , 97 NY2d 171, the Appellate Division explained that as the Taylor Law is incorporated into the New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation Act and the exemptions in the Act are substantially consistent with Article 14 of the Civil Service, "the override provision of Unconsolidated Laws §7405(5) does not apply" in this instance.Noting that the exclusions for managerial and confidential employees are an exception to the… [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 4:30 am
Powers set out in Election Law 3-300 trump relevant provisions in a contract negotiated pursuant to the Taylor Law County of Erie v Civil Serv. [read post]