Search for: "United States v. Bailey"
Results 161 - 180
of 407
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm
Roy Greenslade complained on his blog that the case was “not getting the headlines it deserves” In the Sun Four trial at the Old Bailey the Judge gave legal directions to the jury and there were closing speeches by the prosecution and on behalf of a number of defendants. [read post]
1 Mar 2015, 4:18 pm
United States In the case of Simorangkir v Courtney Love Cobain the Court of Appeal of the State of California dismissed an appeal by Courtney Love seeking to have the case dismissed under California’s anti-SLAPP statute. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 5:44 am
Bailey v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 5:44 am
Bailey v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 10:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:35 pm
United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 9:57 am
This everyday FLSA battle is illustrated in Bailey v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 1:49 pm
Lee Bailey’s just released Excellence in Cross-Examination. [read post]
The parol evidence rule is not a rule of evidence, even though it governs admissibility of testimony
18 Nov 2014, 6:00 pm
Ennis State Bank, 159 Tex. 166, 317 S.W.2d 30, 31 (1958); Gonzalez v. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm
Third, there is the HMRC Leak trial, also at the Old Bailey. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:05 am
The United States Supreme Court stuck defendants in the middle of a mine field, and the California Supreme Court decided that the defendant deserved to be destroyed even if he never actually stepped on a mine. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Supreme Court has refused to review an appeal of a California State Court decision, Bailey v National City, Calif., 277 Cal Rptr 427, which had sustained the termination of a police officer who was found to have violated department rules concerning outside work, used his position as a police officer for personal gain and refused to discontinue a personal association with a known felon.* See United States v ILA Local 1588, 2003 WL 221851, 2003 US… [read post]
2 May 2014, 4:41 am
In an email Kidde sent inNovember 2010, [he] stated he could no longer work with Bergstein because Bank of America had put him on ChexSystems, which prevented him from opening a bank account anywhere in the United States. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 10:55 am
United States, 251 U.S. 385. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:38 am
California and United States v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
See United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:19 am
United States (1926), but they never acknowledge that the Brandeis dissent was rooted in a commitment to participatory democracy that Reynolds did not share. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 2:09 pm
Harris, 338 N.C. 211, 223 n.1 (1994); see also United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 5:36 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 7:51 pm
Having held that a premises rule is workable in (Bailey v. [read post]
