Search for: "United States v. House of Representatives of United States" Results 161 - 180 of 4,645
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2015, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
March traveled to Smith’s house that night to view the photographs. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 6:45 am
Houses of worship frequently stand at the heart of organized religion and are inextricably intertwined with the faiths they represent. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 11:00 pm by Steven Calabresi
The Incompatibility Clause of Article I, Section 6 says that "no Person holding any Office under the United States, shall be a Member of either House during his Continuance in Office. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 7:42 am by Marty Lederman
  To be sure, all United States persons, including citizens and taxpayers, have an interest in ensuring that the Executive complies with the law, and acts only when authorized to do so. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
A policy decision by the employer is not subject to "pre-negotiations;" the impact of that decision on unit members is negotiableMatter of County of Erie & Erie County Sheriff v State of New York Pub. [read post]
19 Aug 2015, 6:47 am by becassidy
Ohio before the United States Supreme Court in 1968. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 1:30 pm by Steve Vladeck
Among the proposed amendments to the DOD appropriations bill currently under consideration in the House of Representatives is this doozy, courtesy of Arkansas Rep. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:09 pm by Matthew David Brozik
One of the plaintiffs is Darth Vader, and the defendant is none other than the most powerful entity in this solar system, the United States of America…! [read post]
23 Nov 2019, 11:12 am by Patricia Salkin
Since the 1920s States have given ultimate zoning authority to their local government units. [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 4:25 pm by Legal Talk Network
Baby Girl before both the United States Supreme Court and the South Carolina Supreme Court and in Nielson v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 1:57 pm by Andrew Hamm
United States of de minimis extensions to traffic stops abrogated or limited Arizona v. [read post]