Search for: "United States v. Marcus"
Results 161 - 180
of 296
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 May 2013, 5:00 am
The baby boom generation is perhaps one of the most affluent in the history of United States and they will have considerable say in the funding of public institutions for some time to come. [read post]
18 May 2013, 5:29 am
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2011 Heard: June 26, 2012 Decided: May 14, 2013 Docket No. 11-5113-cv(L), 12-491-cv(XAP) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, THE VULCAN SOCIETY, INC., MARCUS HAYWOOD, CANDIDO NUNEZ, ROGER GREGG, Intervenors-Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants v. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 10:35 am
United States (12-884). [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 3:14 am
As I wrote in the context of yesterday's decision by a German appeals court to stay a Motorola v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:38 am
Yesterday the United States International Trade Commission tossed whatever little was left (one patent only) of Motorola's complaint against Apple. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
In 1908 the United States Supreme Court ruled in Bobbs-Merrill Company v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 6:45 am
U.S. (12-464).Here's the 11th Circuit opinion, which Judge Marcus wrote. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 1:41 am
Today's rulings were the first two decisions in any of the patent infringement actions Nokia started in May 2012 in the United States and Germany (and which also involves more than a dozen UK cases by now). [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:37 pm
Tobacco manufacturers and the United States government: ready for battle. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 11:45 am
By virtue of having followed the Microsoft v. [read post]
2 Jan 2013, 3:17 pm
United States of America v. [read post]
12 Dec 2012, 7:10 am
The Court’s announcement last week that it would review the constitutionality of the federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2012, 4:57 am
Code § 2511(2)(d) of Title 18, which says it is not unlawful for a person who isnot acting under color of law [i.e., someone who is not a state agent] to intercept a wire, oral, or electronic communication where such person is a party to the communication or where one of the parties to the communication has given prior consent to such interception unless such communication is intercepted for the purpose of committing any criminal or tortious act in violation of the Constitution or laws… [read post]
6 Dec 2012, 10:56 am
· For more on the significant criminal justice reform during the 2012 legislative sessions, read the ACLU’s roundup blog from June.2012 ACLU Reports on Criminal Justice Reform:· At America’s Expense: The Mass Incarceration of the Elderly: Elderly prisoners are twice as expensive to incarcerate as the average prisoner and pose little danger to society, yet the population of… [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 7:01 am
But in the United States, proseuction history is part of the intrinsic evidence considered in claim construction, i.e., it's part of the most important category of evidence. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 4:58 am
LA Fitness International: Shifting Costs to Seek Fairness in Discovery – Reed Smith – http://bit.ly/NejzAg (Patricia Antezana) Warrantless Phone Search Deemed Unconstitutional; Destroys State’s Murder Case – http://bit.ly/P5BXJW (IT-Lex) We Produced Privileged Documents; Now What? [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 7:24 am
In her column for The Washington Post, Ruth Marcus discusses the possibility of a constitutional amendment to overturn the Court’s 2010 decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
S. 82 (1879); and Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 9:06 am
In 2002, Atkins v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 9:40 am
Supreme Court 2007 ruling in Panetti v. [read post]
