Search for: "United States v. Quinn" Results 161 - 180 of 394
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2014, 9:11 pm by Walter Olson
” [Nicholas Quinn Rosenkranz, Cato Supreme Court Review (PDF), earlier on Bond v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 3:57 pm
Further, the the Supreme Court of United States declined hearing the case, because the court determined that such a law did not violate the federal Commerce Clause. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 2:21 am by Florian Mueller
Well over a year since the United States Patent and Trademark Office upheld a few claims of Apple's "rubberbanding" (or "overscroll bounceback") U.S. patent, the European version of that patent has come under massive pressure. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 12:27 pm by Lisa Larrimore Ouellette
In Founding-Era Translations of the United States Constitution, Christina Mulligan, Michael Douma, Hans Lind, and Brian Quinn analyze how these translations might aid interpretation of the Constitution today.Of greatest interest to readers of this blog is likely the Progress Clause:English: To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries . . . .German:… [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 9:04 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which a commercial fisherman was prosecuted under the federal Sarbanes-Oxley Act for destroying undersized fish, and the amicus brief that Cato filed in the case. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 6:34 am by Amy Howe
At the Maryland Appellate Blog, Steve Klepper discusses the possibility that Justice Clarence Thomas could be questioning whether the Court’s decision in Citizens United applies to the states. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 6:12 am by Adam Santucci
The United States Supreme Court has been issuing employment-law related decisions like a boss over the past week or so. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The First Amendment prohibits a State’s collecting an agency shop fee from an individual on behalf of an employee organization that the individual does not wish to join or supportHarris v Quinn, USSC #11-681, decided June 30, 2014The U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm by admin
By Jim Cline In a decision on a case that had presented significant financial and operational important to Public Employee Unions, the United States Supreme Court held this Monday in Harris v Quinn that the Illinois law, as applied to a special class of home health care workers, unconstitutionally imposed a “fair share” dues payment  […]The post In Closely Watched Decision, Supreme Court declines to Hold Mandatory Union Dues Clauses… [read post]