Search for: "United States v. Regents of University of California"
Results 161 - 180
of 217
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am
Wade--was a Burger Court decision, as was its compromise ruling on affirmative action, Regents of the Univ. of California v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
Regents of the University of California—the upcoming U.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Since declaring affirmative action in admissions to be unconstitutional in 1978 in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am
Nor does it make sense for the Court to warn schools – for the third time, after University of California Regents v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Regents of the University of California, the Court this term rejected the government’s attempt to rescind the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:46 am
Regents of University of California (2023) 88 Cal.App.5th 656.[3] AB 1307 expressly provides that unamplified noise from the occupants and guests of residential projects is not a significant impact as defined by CEQA. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:18 am
Hise (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) Supreme Court confirms that a download is not a performance: ASCAP v United States (1709 Copyright Blog) (Ars Technica) District Court S D New York: Court nukes another mass defendant file-sharing lawsuit: Digiprotect v Does (Technology & Marketing Law Blog) District Court E D Virginia calls out copyright trolls’ coercive business model, threaten sanctions K-Beech v Does 1–85 (EFF) (Ars Technica)… [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am
Regents of the University of California, 17-1003. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 7:52 am
When not coaching the Cavaliers, Heikkinen divided his time between his legal studies and his involvement with the University of Virginia’s Flight Preparatory School which was established as part of the United States Navy’s V-12 program during the Second World War. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am
United States, 18-7096. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
City of Newport Beach, California v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
Regents of the University of California, the Cato Institute and Professor Jeremy Rabkin took a different approach. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 5:45 am
Regents of the University of California, 18-587 Issues: (1) Whether the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to wind down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy is judicially reviewable; and (2) whether DHS’ decision to wind down the DACA policy is lawful. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 2:56 am
Mapp v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am
(California’s other “great water project” is the Central Valley Project (“CVP”) operated by the United States Bureau of Reclamation (“USBR”), which stores and distributes water to the Central Valley primarily for agricultural use.) [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:35 am
Kevin Starr (ArsTechnica) US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Liberty Media Holdings – Biggest ever BitTorrent piracy settlement is intriguing (TorrentFreak) Pink Visual – Porn company rejects mass lawsuits, goes after torrent sites (TorrentFreak) Sony – Sony sues over Playstation 3 security hack (IP Osgoode) US Copyright Group – Forget Hurt Locker; P2P lawyers lower sights to Massive Asses 5 (ArsTechnica) Viacom – The Viacom appeal: Viacom v… [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 7:56 am
United States, the court resolved an issue of keen interest to a limited niche of immigrants. [read post]
13 Aug 2024, 3:57 pm
Regents: In the year 2024, in the United States of America, in the State of California, in the City of Los Angeles, Jewish students were excluded from portions of the UCLA campus because they refused to denounce their faith. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
Professor of Law & Director of Clinical Legal Education, UC Davis School of Law--Robert Cover as Critical Race Theorist Mark Graber, University System of Maryland Regents Professor, University of Maryland Carey School of Law & Sandford V. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm
Regents of the University of California—a case about a DHS memo rescinding another well-known but separate policy known as DACA—the Court found here that the DHS secretary had issued his second Remain in Mexico memo with several new explanations for ending MPP. [read post]