Search for: "United States v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania" Results 161 - 180 of 330
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2008, 4:29 pm
 However, two recent decisions by the United States Bankruptcy Court in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania have found that ownership interest of 71% and 41.26% in the new company were sufficient to constitute continuity of ownership. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Specifically, the court was asked to decide if the legislature, by including these items within the definition of “tobacco products,” violated the due process clauses of the United States and Pennsylvania Constitutions. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 5:15 am by Amy Howe
United States ex rel. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 5:46 am by Mark Ashton
Mariani all the more interesting is that since this evolution in the Commonwealth’s legal thinking the United States Supreme Court has weighed in with cases that suggest that decisions by state courts premised upon a family’s right to privacy may not be consistent with textual or original intent as articulated in the Constitution itself. [read post]
26 May 2011, 7:20 am by Maxwell Kennerly
What would the Justices of the United States Supreme Court advised had they have been on those teams? [read post]
26 May 2011, 2:20 am by Maxwell Kennerly
What would the Justices of the United States Supreme Court advised had they have been on those teams? [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 8:00 pm
Those cases are: the Pennsylvania Superior Court's recent ruling in Commonwealth v. [read post]
20 Apr 2024, 8:18 am by Eugene Volokh
City of Pittsburgh, decided yesterday by the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court (Judge Patricia A. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 10:19 am by Eugene Volokh
Some me­dals and dull jests are mentioned and represented as a ground of quarrel be­tween the English and Dutch in 1672, and likewise caused Louis the XIV to make an expedition into the United Provinces of the Netherlands in the same year, and nearly ruined that Commonwealth. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
"Plaintiffs' brief before the Commonwealth Court repeatedly invoked their rights under the Pennsylvania Constitution, but never directly mentioned their rights under the United States Constitution. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Bexis
  Rather:A federal court may act as a judicial pioneer when interpreting the United States Constitution and federal law. . . . [read post]