Search for: "United States v. Goldman" Results 161 - 180 of 478
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2012, 9:53 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
And in the year's most talked-about non-compete case, the Supreme Court of the United States reversed a decision of the Oklahoma Supreme Court and held that an arbitrator, not a state court, must determine the enforceability of a non-compete agreement if the underlying contract contains an arbitration clause. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 5:25 am by Amy Howe
United States (here, with Gabriel Lather) and Hickenlooper v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:03 am by Mike Widener
In the United States analogous legal relationships had led to a devastating Civil War. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 8:02 am by Eric
United Parcel Service, Inc., No. 09 CVS 2582 (N.C. [read post]
7 Aug 2013, 1:00 am by Christine Nielsen
The Second Circuit’s decision in Agrawal is puzzling if not downright shocking to those familiar with the Second Circuit’s decision last April in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:11 am by Justin Cole
” Brief that makes this argument: The United States, filed in support of vacatur. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 10:02 am by Susan Brenner
[T]he Government . . . expects to prove at trial that there are high-frequency trading systems that may be purchased by securities trading firms, and that Goldman maintains computers in the United States and elsewhere in the world that use its Trading System to conduct trading on world markets. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 9:00 am
            Last February, the United States Supreme Court added another layer to its punitive damages jurisprudence in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
May 16, 2007)at the 9th Circuit WebsiteThe opinion is also available online at Stanford Cyberlawand at LawGeek (Jason Schulz)The copyright infringement case discussed in this posting and just decided in the 9th Circuit of the United States Court of Appeals really has it all. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 4:21 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court on April 23, representing the United States in a criminal sentencing case. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 8:13 am by Andrew Hamm
United States and argues that “[w]hat’s at stake in this case is whether the justices will… make it easier for prosecutors to pursue certain types of insider trading claims. [read post]