Search for: "United States v. Khan" Results 161 - 180 of 326
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Oct 2011, 5:15 am
(My thanks to IntLawGrrls for the opportunity to contribute this guest post)Yesterday, the former President of the United States, George W. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 8:51 am by Dennis Crouch
Zorina Khan, Married Women’s Property Laws and Female Commercial Activity: Evidence from United States Patent Records, 1790-1895, 56 J. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 8:16 am by Cinthia Macie
”  The FTC’s “Made in USA” labeling rule will prohibit marketers from using that designation unless “1) final assembly or processing of the product occurs in the United States; 2) all significant processing that goes into the product occurs in the United States; and 3) all or virtually all ingredients or components of the product are made and sourced in the United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm by Giles Peaker
London Borough of Tower Hamlets v Khan (2022) EWCA Civ 831 contained no suggestion that a money claim might amount to waiver, and Cussens v Realreed Limited (2013) EWHC 1229 suggested that an action for damages (other than non-payment of service charges) could equally found a s.146 notice as well as a declaration of breach. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am by John Elwood
United States, 13-1487, voluntarily turned over to the FBI fifteen firearms while unrelated marijuana charges were pending against him. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 7:57 am by John Elwood
United States, 14-29, involving a prosecution under §10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act, or the ’34 Act, as we old-timers call it (rescheduled for this Friday’s Conference); and Crews v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:37 pm by Jack McNeill
Tobacco manufacturers and the United States government: ready for battle. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 6:59 am by Sarah Taitz
A version of this argument spilled out in public in United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Nicklin J handed down judgment in the harassment case of Khan (formerly JMO) v Khan (formerly KTA) [2018] EWHC 241 (QB)). [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am by Erin Miller
UPDATE, Jan. 7: Today United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 5:38 am by Lanie Bennett
Chamber of Commerce (uschamber.com); Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Business Roundtable, Texas Association of Business, and Longview Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 8:52 am by Carolina Bracken
Looking to Strasbourg jurisprudence, he commented, “[t]he ECtHR will only find that the state has acted in violation of A1P1” if its judgment is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” (James v United Kingdom (1986) 8 EHRR 123). [read post]