Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 161 - 180
of 9,067
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2014, 1:23 pm
(thetakeaway.org) Events to mark 60 years since Topeka’s Brown v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 1:27 pm
The argument preview for United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2014, 7:17 am
United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:26 pm
Supp. 2d. 410 (SDNY 2002); United We Stand Am., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:26 pm
Supp. 2d. 410 (SDNY 2002); United We Stand Am., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 8:27 am
United States, the conservative justice used originalist principles to defend 21st-century digital privacy. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
United States , 133 S. [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 7:34 am
United States v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 9:44 pm
The Rule Regarding Use in Commerce of a Service Mark TMEP § 901.01 states that “a mark shall be deemed to be in use in commerce… on services when it is used or displayed in the sale or advertising of services and the services are rendered in commerce, or the services are rendered in more than one State or in the United States and a foreign country and the person rendering the services is engaged in commerce in connection… [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on March 23, 1926. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 11:53 am
On June 10, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 12:31 pm
In 1943, Congress amended the False Claims Act to implement a number of safeguards that are present today to enable the United States control over False Claims Act litigation. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 6:47 am
This decision comes after the English Courts had similarly refused the registration of the same Shape Marks in the United Kingdom. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 8:22 am
Promote Innovation LLC v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 6:26 am
Under § 292(b), half of the $500 fine is kept by the plaintiff, and the other half goes to the United States. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:17 am
Pape, a seminal case decided by the United States Supreme Court in 1961, holds great historical significance in civil rights litigation against law enforcement. [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:33 am
The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, in a Section 21 civil action for review, affirmed the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (114 USPQ2d 1080 (TTAB 2014)) [TTABlogged here], ordering cancellation of the federal registrations for six marks - five consisting of or comprising the word REDSKINS, and the sixth the mark REDSKINETTES - for football entertainment services, on the ground of Section 2(a) disparagement. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 9:02 pm
” The government could make this showing only by pointing to historical regulations analogous to the regulation under review.Now, in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 6:37 pm
Nonetheless, as Mark Warner, a Virginia Democrat, stated, “the good news is, Congress is not going to be the Grinch”. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 6:47 am
United States and Koons v. [read post]
