Search for: "United States v. Sealed Search Warrant"
Results 161 - 180
of 211
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
” The warrant was issued on Aug. 2 by Magistrate Judge Susan E. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
The district court refused to stay enforcement of the search warrant while it adjudicated Twitter’s challenge, which it later rejected. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 6:37 am
The district court refused to stay enforcement of the search warrant while it adjudicated Twitter’s challenge, which it later rejected. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
customers within the United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
FTC, 710 F.2d 1165, 1178 (6th Cir.1983) (so stating in opposition to sealing generally). [read post]
14 Oct 2009, 1:57 am
The American position, so they explain, is unforgiving and typified by the decision in United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 9:26 pm
., writes: In two cases that pit privacy interests over the public's right to know (including the right to know too much), In the Matter of the New York Times Company to Unseal Wiretap and Search Warrant Materials in United States v. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 2:36 pm
Rowan, No. 05-30536 On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, a 60-month sentence of supervised release following a conviction for possession of child pornography is affirmed where: 1) defendant's sentence is a non-Guideline sentence since it falls outside the applicable range and was not based on an allowed departure; but 2) in light of the deferential standard set forth in Gall, there was no significant procedural error in the sentencing decision. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Wiretap Act (also known as Title III) prohibits the interception of a live communication (e.g., a telephone call) only if the interception occurs in the United States; it does not prohibit or regulate wiretaps (interception) conducted abroad.[8] Similarly, the U.S. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
Circuit in United States v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:36 pm
” To “defraud the United States” has a specific meaning under U.S. case law: According to Hammerschmidt v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:33 am
In conclusion, the unanimous court observed: Wayne Jones was killed just over one year before the Ferguson, Missouri shooting of Michael Brown would once again draw national scrutiny to police shootings of black people in the United States. [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 2:12 pm
” And part of why those constitutional concerns don’t arise in the context of search warrants is because the subject of the warrant will usually have an opportunity to attack the warrant–and, thus, the search–collaterally, whether in a motion to suppress in a criminal prosecution or a civil suit for damages, both of which would be after-the-fact. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 3:05 pm
Kwon v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 7:59 am
" State ex rel. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 10:55 pm
PUBLISHED OPINIONS Opinion Short Title/District 08a0403p.06 Chavtz Seals v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 10:02 am
See Daubert v. [read post]
29 Oct 2017, 3:05 pm
Kwon v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 5:53 am
In addition, the following court records are public and may be withheld only when sealed by court order: arrest and search warrants that have been returned by law enforcement agencies, indictments, criminal summons, and nontestimonial identification orders. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
United States and Florida v. [read post]
