Search for: "United States v. State of ND"
Results 161 - 180
of 482
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2008, 7:38 am
In the case of United Technologies Corp. v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 11:56 am
United States, 928 F.2d 829, 843 (9th Cir.1991), and Stephens v. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 11:06 am
United States, 2017 U.S. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 1:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
In Lower Colorado River Authority v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:10 am
This action challenges certain provisions of the [city ordnances under] ... the United States Constitution, the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000, 42 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 4:11 am
In Mial v. [read post]
12 Dec 2024, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Child Evangelism Fellowship NORCAL, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 4:05 am
Congress of the United States of America, (ND OH, filed 1/11/2016) traces in almost law-review style (and with 362 footnotes) the history of "In God We Trust" on coinage and currency. [read post]
19 Jun 2020, 7:45 am
Cuomo, (ND NY, filed 6/18/2020), alleges in part:5. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Plaintiffs in the case are represented by Americans United for Separation of Church and State, the National Women’s Law Center (NWLC), the Center for Reproductive Rights and their co-counsel. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 4:05 am
In a new test of abortion rights, four medical organizations and four doctors filed suit last week in a Texas federal district court challenging the FDA's long-standing approval for use in the United States of the chemical abortion drugs mifepristone and misoprostol. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 11:51 am
See United Steelworkers of Am. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 5:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2018, 4:16 am
United States, which involves the effect of the dual-officeholder ban on military judges. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 5:16 am
The court noted that a committee report could not serve as an independent statutory source having the force of law, citing United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 5:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
The Supreme Court [of the United States] subsequently rejected such inferences as incompatible with ordinary contract principles under federal law in M and G Polymers USA, LLC v Tackett (574 US 427 [2015]) and CNH Industrial N.V. v Reese (583 US 138 S Ct 761 [2018]), repudiating International Union, United Auto., Aerospace, and Agric. [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 5:15 pm
United States, 2007 U.S. [read post]
