Search for: "United States v. Wells" Results 161 - 180 of 31,790
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2008, 11:49 pm
United States: An Emerging Model for Domestic Violence & Human Rights Advocacy in the United States (Harvard Human Rights Journal, Vol. 21, 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:01 am by Charles Nichols
Nacchio’s request as well as the United States Attorney’s (“Government”) objection to that request can be found here. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:38 pm by Robert Chesney
  The 2009 indictment states that from September of 2007 through August of 2009, Omar, a Somali citizen who is a lawful permanent resident of the United States, conspired with others to provide financial assistance as well as personnel to al-Shabaab. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Ratified by the President of the United States on February 21, 1923. [read post]
18 May 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The Treaty marks a significant step in bilateral cooperation between the United States and Luxembourg. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:47 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
  Arizona’s licensing law falls well within the confines of the authority Congress chose to leave to the States and therefore is not expressly preempted. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 4:21 pm by Sheppard Mullin
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011, the United States Supreme Court decided AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 8:50 am by Tess Bridgeman
” But the decision sparked outrage in domestic policy circles and consternation amongst coalition partners, who feared the United States was abandoning its Kurdish and Syrian allies to IS, as well as ceding strategic gains to Russia and Iran (and indeed, as U.S. forces withdrew from areas in the north, Russian forces swept in “to fill the void”). [read post]
10 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
It was Ratified by the President of the United States of America on October 29, 1963. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 2:02 pm by The Federalist Society
The first question in the case is whether Arizona’s reliance on a commission to draw up congressional districts rather than its state legislature violates the Elections Clause of the United States Constitution as well as Title 2 of the U.S. [read post]