Search for: "Unpublished Disposition" Results 161 - 180 of 386
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2014, 8:45 am
In an unpublished [2006] opinion, the Michigan Court of Appeals analyzed a goose attack on a delivery person. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:41 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  The firm has expertise in all real property matters, including full-service litigation and dispute resolution services, transactions, acquisitions, dispositions, leasing, construction, management, title insurance, environmental law, and redevelopment and land use. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
 The Nevada Supreme Court currently disposes of most of its cases through non-precedential, unpublished orders. [read post]
4 Dec 2014, 10:21 am
 Must be an en banc call over an unpublished disposition. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 3:17 am
As we see it, the district court lacked the power to consider in any way the validity of the 2008 FCC Ruling and also erred in concluding that the FCC's interpretation did not control the disposition of the case. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 7:39 am by Ryan Goellner
In the past year, just over a dozen pro se appeals were decided by the Sixth Circuit in published or unpublished opinions. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 6:24 am by James Goodman
On November 5, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, in an unpublished disposition, issued its opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
We’ve made no secret of our distaste for the so called “heeding presumption” – that juries may presume that any alternative “adequate” warning would have been heeded by the plaintiff (or, in prescription medical product cases, the prescriber). [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 11:19 am by Rory Little
In an unpublished opinion, a three-judge panel of the Fifth Circuit agreed with Texas (and rehearing was subsequently denied). [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 11:29 am by Arthur F. Coon
  In an unpublished part of its opinion, the Court dodged a potentially important issue – Petitioner’s argument against the cost award based on an indemnity agreement between the County and Real Party in Interest – on the basis that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in disregarding the argument since Petitioners failed to raise it or the “new evidence” supporting it in their reply brief. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 11:07 am by Schachtman
(affirming judgment entered on verdict that apportioned causation of lung cancer and consequent death, but remanding on a liability issue), reported only for disposition at 838 F.2d 462 (3d Cir. 1987). [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 8:54 am by stevehansen
LEXIS 120133 at *19, unpublished, (D.N.J. 2010) (“practical considerations . . . militate against determining indefiniteness prior to the end of all discovery”); Pharmastem Therapeutics, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2014, 4:33 pm by Shahram Miri
This judgment was upheld on appeal in an unpublished decision. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 10:59 am by Arthur F. Coon
In a lengthy, mostly-unpublished opinion filed on August 14, 2014, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the superior court’s judgment denying a writ petition challenging the Parkmerced Development Project. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 3:32 am by Peter Mahler
The Budis Case On the other hand, sometimes the provisions of the operating agreement reinforce the statutory default rules, as illustrated in a recent, unpublished decision by Queens County Commercial Division Justice Orin R. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 2:11 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  This scenario was exemplified in a recent Fifth District Court of Appeal decision, which it ordered certified for partial publication after it was initially filed on June 30, 2014 as an unpublished opinion. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 9:04 am by Arthur F. Coon
  These included significant CEQA issues concerning greenhouse gas (GHG) baseline setting and assessment methodology which were addressed in an unpublished portion of the decision. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:21 am by Mack Sperling
  Although Section 2.02 might seem to be dispositive, it was expressly subject to Section 2.03 (which contained the problematic "with" language). [read post]