Search for: "Ware v. Ware" Results 161 - 180 of 586
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2019, 7:54 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Written by Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Editor at First Reference In Moore v Ferro (Estate), 2019 HRTO 526 (CanLII) (“Moore”), a British-trained lawyer licensed to practice in Ontario applied for a position at a law firm and was denied. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:47 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Student at law, Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:00 am by Rose Falconer
  Judge Waring’s work also includes introducing black jurors to juries in Charleston and mandating equal pay for black and white teachers. [read post]
10 Sep 2020, 6:59 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
Lewis Waring, Paralegal and Student-at-Law, Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 6:10 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
By Lewis Waring, Paralegal and Student-at-Law, Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 6:47 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
By Lewis Waring, Paralegal and Student-at-Law, Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 2:14 am
Safe to say, for Deputy Attorney general Jeremy Friedlander, Harvest v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 1:39 pm by Gregory Forman
Eventually, I may need to petition the United States Supreme Court for certiorari in the case of Ware v. [read post]
Written by Lewis Waring, Paralegal and Student-at-Law, First Reference Editor In Canadian Pacific Railway v United Steelworkers – TC Local 1976 (“Canadian Pacific”), an employer’s dismissal of an employee who committed a safety infraction while intoxicated with cannabis was upheld as reasonable. [read post]
Written by Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Student-at-Law (3rd year), Editor, First Reference Inc. [read post]
Written by Lewis Waring, Paralegal, Student-at-Law, Editor at First Reference In Nguyen v Central Stampings Limited (“Nguyen”), an employee’s feeling that an employer’s conduct derived from discriminatory intent due to his sex was not sufficient to obtain compensation for violation of the Ontario Human Rights Code. [read post]