Search for: "Word v. U. S" Results 161 - 180 of 2,423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2022, 9:36 pm by Josh Blackman
I used Scalia's words to write an imagined concurrence in Texas v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:56 pm
   Procedural HistoryThe basic dispute in this case concerns the meaning of the words “molecular weight” as those words appear in a patent claim. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 5:05 am by SHG
  While Orin shows some skepticism, notably by his putting the word “can” in italics, he goes on to discuss how this would reflect poorly on both sides, Apple as well as the government. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 8:46 am by Ann Caresani
Supreme Court decides to take this case, it could reject the DOL’s arguments on the same basis that it rejected the DOL’s arguments in CIGNA v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 7:37 am by Danielle Citron
  Here is the piece: Last week’s unanimous decision of the Supreme Court in U.S. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2009, 6:44 am
 Of course, we could echo Justice Scalia's words about Bush v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 1:06 pm by Public Employment Law Press
The United States Supreme Court held that the State’s extraction of agency fees from nonconsenting public-sector employees violated the First Amendment, overruling its earlier decision in Abood v Detroit Board of Education, 431 U. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 4:00 am
Employee’s claim that she did not receive notice of disciplinary charges mailed to her rebutted by employer’s evidence of proper mailings Katz v Board of Educ. of City School Dist. of City of N.Y., 2008 NY Slip Op 31935(U),  Supreme Court, New York County, Judge: Shirley Werner Kornreich [Not selected for publication in the Official Reports] The New York City Board of Education [BOE] sent a “notice of charges” to a tenured teacher. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 9:09 am by Old Fox
The text was in Latin, of course, and so only 23 letters were required (Latin does not use J , V or W; however V is now used to represent the consonantal U, and sometimes J to represent consonantal I).The phrase was rather nonsensical Latin. [read post]