Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 3,575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2009, 8:35 am
Y, the defendant in X v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 5:37 am
Oh, lord no. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 7:30 am
Relying greatly on Lord Langdale’s analysis in Lewis v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
UN member states asked the UK about ‘super-injunctions’, online freedom of expression and the defamation bill: “The UK’s representative at the review, Lord McNally, responded to the questions and recommendations regarding defamation and its impact on freedom of expression by stating that ‘his baby’ aimed to get the balance right between a free media and the right of the individual to privacy, and that it was regarded as a ‘good… [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 11:52 am
Lord Hodge gave the leading judgment with whom Lord Reed, Lady Black and Lord Lloyd-Jones agreed. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 10:32 pm
What puzzles me slightly, particularly given the stated aim of consistency, is the difference in approach to that of Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd [2008] 1 WLR 289 (which I briefly discussed here). [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:14 am
Although Gandy v Jubber was settled before the judgment was pronounced it has been treated as good authority in subsequent cases, including by the House of Lords in Monk. [read post]
28 May 2008, 6:37 am
By overwhelming vote, the European Court agreed, quoting with approval lengthy excerpts from the opinions by the British Law Lords. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 7:41 am
Lord Reed, Lord Leggatt and Lord Stephens agreed. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
The families argued that Re McKerr had been rendered obsolete by the recent Strasbourg decision of Šilih v Slovenia (2009) 49 E.H.R.R. 37. [read post]
4 Jan 2013, 3:27 pm
He stated that the mask is to prevent a robbery, not to commit one. [read post]
4 Dec 0001, 4:00 pm
He stated that the mask is to prevent a robbery, not to commit one. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Nevertheless, on the present state of the law, the technique is legal. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 2:49 pm
The Court of Appeal decision in McKennitt v Ash was followed shortly afterwards in the Court of Appeal decision in Lord Browne v Associated Newspapers [2008] QB 103. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
Meanwhile Longmore LJ stated that: The question in a case of misuse of private information is whether the information is private, not whether it is true or false. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 5:11 pm
Our starting place is Entick v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 1:00 am
R (Public Law Project) v The Lord Chancellor, heard 18 April 2016. [read post]
30 May 2013, 12:44 pm
” The most high profile media case of the week was Lord McAlpine’s claim against Sally Bercow. [read post]
30 May 2013, 12:44 pm
” The most high profile media case of the week was Lord McAlpine’s claim against Sally Bercow. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm
However, Lord Hamblen and Lord Burrows dissented on this issue, arguing that if the tort of malicious falsehood is actionable per se under s3(1), then it follows that damages should also be awarded without the need for proof of financial loss. [read post]
