Search for: "Orin Kerr"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 3,371
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm
The civil case Orin refers to in the recording is Pietrylo v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 2:35 am
Orin Kerr notes that John Yoo's torture memo sounds very lawyerly in its arguments. [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 9:18 pm
Orin seems to have the better of it by my eyes, but perhaps that's just my confirmation bias. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 2:00 pm
(Orin Kerr) A few days ago, David Bernstein mentioned David Schraub’s post explaining his disagreement with my view questioning the propriety of Judge Brown’s concurring opinion calling for a return to Lochner in Hettinga v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:07 am
Via Orin Kerr at VC: On August 19th, Justice Kennedy gave an address that included an interesting passing remark about the role of blogs. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 4:24 am
See for example TheRaceToTheBottom and Orin Kerr/Volokh Conspiracy . [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:38 am
(Orin Kerr) As a specialist in computer crime law, I am occasionally asked how to find a good defense lawyer in a computer crime case. [read post]
25 Aug 2013, 9:05 pm
“ABA Task Force Releases Draft of Recommendations to Reform Legal Education” [Orin Kerr] “ABA Panel Favors Dropping Law School Tenure Requirement” [Karen Sloan, NLJ] Now we’re getting somewhere, cont’d? [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 10:32 pm
(Orin Kerr) You’re no doubt familiar with this Term’s Supreme Court case involving a constitutional challenge to an “unprecedented” recent federal law. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 9:33 pm
(Orin Kerr) Over at Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger has an interesting post on the Supreme Court’s recent qualified immunity decision, Reichle v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 11:29 am
(Orin Kerr) I have blogged a lot about the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 18 U.S.C. 1030, the federal criminal statute designed to punish computer hacking. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:04 am
Via Orin Kerr and John Wesley Hall, a California Court of Appeals held that night vision goggles are a constitutionally acceptable means of seeing what you couldn't otherwise see. in People v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 6:59 am
Continuing the discussion that Einer Elhauge started (see these additional posts from Orin Kerr, Larry Tribe, Einer and myself), I was thinking that the claim that "narrow doctrinalism is dead" is not only nothing new, it is the most familiar pronouncement in the history of American legal education. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:53 pm
(Orin Kerr) I recently blogged about United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 10:38 pm
(Orin Kerr) Back in 2009, I blogged about a fascinating Fourth Amendment district court decision involving how the border search exception applies to computers, United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 3:40 pm
(Orin Kerr) While there’s a lot worth criticizing in David Segal’s NYT article about law professors and law schools — Matt Bodie covers a lot of good ground in this post at Prawfs — there’s an underlying point that I think is both important and correct: Law professors, at especially the “top” law schools, are becoming less connected to the legal profession. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:31 pm
(Orin Kerr) One of the emerging criticisms of the Sixth Circuit opinion upholding the individual mandate — and especially Judge Sutton’s separate opinion — is that the Sixth Circuit erred because the individual mandate should be presumed unconstitutional. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:11 am
(Orin Kerr) For those who are currently playing the game of who-is-the-Supreme-Court-leaker, here’s an intriguing clue. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:03 am
(Orin Kerr) Here’s an interesting question about the proper scope of government arising from Obion County, Tennessee. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 4:15 pm
(Orin Kerr) I’ve blogged a lot about 18 U.S.C. 1030, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), and how broad readings of the statute potentially criminalize a tremendous amount of entirely innocuous activity. [read post]
