Search for: "People v Davis"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 2,038
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
States have justified their constitutional critiques of federal actions by claiming for themselves the role of representatives of the American people, or at least, a considerable proportion of that people. [read post]
17 Sep 2020, 12:34 pm
EFF, together with Daphne Keller at the Stanford Cyber Law Center, as well as lawyers from Davis Wright Tremaine and Walters Law Group, represent the plaintiffs. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 1:08 pm
It does not, in our view, affect the substance of Article 25, which is concerned with universal franchise and the free expression of the people in the choice of legislature. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 6:00 am
., United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Evan Davis, Partner, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, and former Counsel to then New York State Governor Mario M. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
The answer is yes, and the Supreme Court effectively made that clear four years ago in its important ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:45 am
[MD-7] - 7/12/2007 Rep Davis, Danny K. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 8:57 am
[MD-7] - 7/12/2007 Rep Davis, Danny K. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 9:27 am
§ 7701(a); see MySpace, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
So they sought out people of color and low-income individuals, people with progressive values who had been ignored. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 11:12 am
The Civil War, rather than the founding - rather than Marbury v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
Ø Title VII v. the First AmendmentAvila v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
The first was New York v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 7:26 am
In McCleskey v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
And no way out for the people of Georgia, either. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am
The plea gets its name from 1970’s North Carolina v. [read post]
