Search for: "Smith v. Judges" Results 1781 - 1800 of 5,943
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2012, 11:51 am by Venkat
Pandora Jewelry * 17 USC 512(f) Claim Against "Twilight" Studio Survives Motion to Dismiss--Smith v. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:25 pm
 Whether you have a right to an attorney (at your own expense) before being removed from the United States.The voting line-up is also not surprising given the panel draw.Judge Bybee, joined by Judge Randy Smith, believes that non-citizens who are caught in the United States and subjected to expedited removal proceedings are not entitled to hire a lawyer at their own expense to defend themselves in those proceedings.Judge Pregerson dissents, and believes that they possess such… [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 10:38 am by Sheppard Mullin
Smith and Ryan Duffy Last month, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit raised the stakes on what has become one of the most prominent topics in the labor law community in recent times with its 2-1 decision in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
26 Nov 2024, 12:53 pm by Sophia Cope
Smith’s prosecution because, the judge concluded, the officers had a “good faith” belief that they were legally permitted to search his phone without a warrant. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 3:02 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 188330, Dec. 27, 2012) to dismiss without prejudice the claim by two inmates that being forced to eatnon-Kosher  food, being prohibited from being in the same cell, and being called "fake Jews" by a corrections officer violated their free exercise rights.In Smith v. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 11:59 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 26198 (SD GA, Feb. 26, 2013), a Georgia federal magistrate judge permitted an inmate to proceed with his claim that he did not receive the restricted vegan diet demanded by his religious beliefs.In Mills v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 9:53 pm by INFORRM
  But what about, say, the Blogger platform considered in Tamiz v Google and Davison v Habeeb? [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 2:54 pm by Jo Ann Hoffman & Associates, P.A.
(Fla 1st DCA 2013) Payment of medical bills for a workers compensation injury are outside the JCC jurisdiction per JBD Brothers and Masonry v Miranda, 25 So.3rd 1271 (1st DCA 2010) JCC has no jurisdiction over retaliatory discharge issues per Smith v Piez Technology, 427 So.2d 182 (Fla 1983). [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
The Judge had dismissed the claim Serafin v Malkiewicz & Ors on a number of grounds (see our case comment). [read post]