Search for: "United States v. Paul"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 4,492
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2019, 11:40 am
Grewal used to serve as a United States Magistrate Judge in the Northern District of California. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 11:08 am
United States, upholding the 2017 tax act's mandatory repatriation tax (MRT) on foreign source income (FSI) of American-controlled foreign corporations. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 8:00 am
Federal: NLRB withdraws its appeal of Chamber of Commerce of United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 12:46 pm
Paul Clement of D.C. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 7:56 am
Iqbal (and the 2007 case of Bell Atlantic v Twombly) held is insufficient to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [read post]
11 Oct 2014, 6:55 am
Jane announced that the Fourth Circuit affirmed the 2012 refusal to vacate the sentence in the United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 7:39 am
United States Postal Service. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:33 pm
Michael Pauling, Senior Assistant Attorney General; Paul S. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:57 am
”As he put it, “When the constitutionality of COVID restrictions has been challenged in court, the leading authority cited in their defense is a 1905 Supreme Court decision called Jacobson v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:15 pm
United States: Elliott Welsh’s Two Religious TestsAndrew KoppelmanChapter 11Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 7:14 am
Paul Nicklen is a highly acclaimed nature photographer. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:04 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Paul alerted us to the Supreme Court’s pending decision in City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 5:48 am
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit 2014); United States v. [read post]
18 Nov 2017, 2:11 pm
In 2002, the Supreme Court held in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:00 am
When Ralls filed suit alleging violations of due process and the Administrative Procedure Act, President Obama himself issued a similar order demanding that Ralls divest and stating that he had “credible evidence” that Ralls’ actions might “impair the national security of the United States. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 5:57 pm
Although the Supreme Court did not accept KSR's submissions in full, it unanimously agreed that they were correct on the facts of tbe dispute before it.On the background to this ruling and the TSM test, see Patently-O hereOn yesterday's ruling see Patently-O, Patent Baristas and and Duncan BucknellMicrosoft Corp v AT & T was a 7-1 ruling (Justice John Paul Stephens dissenting) that allowed Microsoft's appeal and agreed that the company should not be held… [read post]
19 Oct 2013, 7:00 am
Also in FISC-related transparency news: the FISC declassified as much as it could of its latest business records telephony metadata program; I wrote about two issues dealt with in that order: Judge Claire Eagan’s “relevance” analysis in her August memorandum, and addressing Supreme Court Justices opinions in United States v. [read post]
29 May 2019, 5:54 am
OFAC made clear that the guidance was intended for U.S. companies as well as non-U.S. companies that conduct business in or with the United States, with U.S. persons, or using U.S. origin goods or services. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 7:20 am
Support for the ICC’s Trust Fund for Victims by Paul R. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 3:00 am
United States, 491 U.S. 617 (1989) and United States v. [read post]
