Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 6,887
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Aug 2010, 4:30 am
You don't get many votes for funding the construction of a new courthouse. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 6:12 am
Our colleagues in the legal defense bar don’t exactly disagree, but generally argue that the rules are fair. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 4:31 am
New York Criminal Lawyer Scott Greenfield, always on the ball, brings us news out of Texas:In Collin County (criminal defense lawyers' Thunderdome), criminal defense lawyer Chris Hoover, faced with a judge who refused to recuse himself or to refer the recusal motion to the presiding judge (as required by statute), deliberately refused to participate in his client's trial.Chris moved for a continuance (denied); he announced "not ready"; he… [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 10:32 am
(FISA provides a mechanism for defendants to request this information, but no defendant has succeeded in doing so in FISA’s 40-year history.) [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 10:45 am
We don’t allow people to reproduce textbooks at will. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 10:45 am
Working against us, in his view, are the facts that we do this alone, and we don't print out our content on dead trees. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 11:34 am
Even if we agreed with that precedent (generally, we don’t), it has no application to the Playpen cases. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 5:07 am
It's not that judges don't realize that putting someone in prison has a cost, or is expensive, but that they lack the information necessary to have a meaningful appreciation of just how expensive a particular sentence is. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 8:27 am
Folks, this is why people don't like going to the dentist. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 12:40 am
Like Orin Kerr at Volokh, I still don't see that this is a big issue because the military has always had its own rules and never has factored into 8th Amendment evolving standards cases. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 5:16 am
Therefore, defendant's statement, "We are glad to see the judge found what we knew all along, that this is protected free speech," is clearly not defamatory because it is true. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:57 am
And I sure don't know if anyone is playing hide the sausage with exculpatory material. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 2:53 pm
" Since federal courts avoid making a "major decision of constitutional law" if they don't have to, Kozinski chose the safer path of construing the state to permit coverage of same-sex spouses, and then ordering the administrators to process Golinski's health benefits election form as submitted. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:36 am
The FTC won't be able to go down that road because it's politically difficult enough for the FTC to even just defend its trial win, so there's no realistic way the FTC could agree on a more aggressive theory. [read post]
12 May 2018, 7:07 am
He believes that, "A mindful focus on individual defendants in the courtroom can allow judges to contribute to large-scale reform. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 2:49 pm
We will ban its judges and prosecutors from entering the United States. [read post]
15 May 2023, 5:01 am
They don't, however, protect positive rights or procedural rights. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 4:30 am
When Justice Gorsuch or any other judge "looks on the books" in a qualified immunity case, they won't ever find a case that's identical to the case before them. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
If the defendant can't independently act immediately, then it can't comply with both requirements and there's impossibility preemption. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:54 pm
But my word, when we're talking about the interpretation of the Constitution of the United States, we don't want someone who has an attitude of harshness. [read post]
