Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 1781 - 1800
of 6,912
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Nov 2011, 9:22 am
Sometimes personal injury victims don't seek medical attention immediately: they think they will recover on their own, or they don't like doctors, or they're worried about the bills. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 10:59 pm
But elected benches are by nature glaringly "fishy" (i.e., "...dang, Nadine, the campaign money to the judge last year...it don't seem right... [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 6:57 am
And I sure don't know if anyone is playing hide the sausage with exculpatory material. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 10:13 am
Perhaps the defendant in Beard preserved the issue, we don’t know, but that didn't matter since the defense cross-petition for alloca [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 9:45 am
But it's a big job, so don't expect us to finish it in one post. [read post]
10 Aug 2008, 10:36 am
I don't expect I ever will. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 7:36 am
If Title IX recipients are permitted to deny transgender students access to the listed facilities based on their sex assigned at birth (and to be clear, I don't think they are so permitted), that doesn't undermine the applicability of the Bostock logic in other settings. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
We love all judges! [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
Not all facts are relevant to prove a point, and some facts simply don't matter, given what is at issue. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm
So the author's looking at whether it’s a state rather than a federal court, whether the court is favoring an in-state party (plaintiff or defendant), whether the judge was elected (or the person appointing an appointed judge) as a D or an R, and race or gender.That seems OK to us. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 4:30 am
When Justice Gorsuch or any other judge "looks on the books" in a qualified immunity case, they won't ever find a case that's identical to the case before them. [read post]
22 May 2012, 10:01 am
DON’T BE AFRAID OF CONTROVERSY. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 6:12 am
Our colleagues in the legal defense bar don’t exactly disagree, but generally argue that the rules are fair. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 2:53 pm
" Since federal courts avoid making a "major decision of constitutional law" if they don't have to, Kozinski chose the safer path of construing the state to permit coverage of same-sex spouses, and then ordering the administrators to process Golinski's health benefits election form as submitted. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 8:34 pm
This record is particularly notable, since Judge Weinstein, who decided all of these cases, isn't a judge known for cutting our side any breaks.The news hasn't been as good, unfortunately, out of the Aredia-Zometa litigation. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:36 am
The FTC won't be able to go down that road because it's politically difficult enough for the FTC to even just defend its trial win, so there's no realistic way the FTC could agree on a more aggressive theory. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 9:20 am
[In most states, if a court issues a gag order and you don't appeal it, you can go to jail for violating it even if you later argue that it violates your First Amendment rights.] [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm
’ And they don’t have to stop doing it. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 4:30 am
You don't get many votes for funding the construction of a new courthouse. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:30 pm
It's happened again, though this time we don't have video. [read post]
