Search for: "Court v. Administrative Office" Results 1801 - 1820 of 14,561
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 4:30 am
Changing the job description of a position to include new or additional duties must satisfy a "rational basis" test to survive judicial scrutinyMatter of Criscolo v Vagianelis, 2009 NY Slip Op 01319, Decided on February 24, 2009, Court of AppealsThe NYS Department of Correctional Services provides for three levels of administrative hearings to consider "inmate misbehavior reports. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:16 am by John Jascob
By Amanda Maine, J.D.The SEC has filed a brief opposing a petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court on whether the SEC’s administrative law judges are inferior officers unconstitutionally appointed under the Appointments Clause. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 1:56 pm
  The ordinance merely stated that the Office of Administrative Hearings shall hear the appeal "within a reasonable time as set forth within its regulations". [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Although the disciplinary action before the SCB was held "in absentia" as the result of Petitioners failure to appear at the hearing,* the court ruled that Petitioner's due process rights were not violated by SUNY Albany's student disciplinary procedures as Petitioner was given written notice of the charges prior to a hearing, the names of the witnesses against her, an opportunity to hear and confront evidence against her and to present a defense and to be advised… [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 12:38 am
Challenging an administrative determination by a civil service commission Challenging an administrative determination by a civil service commission Horn v The New York City Civil Service Commission, 43 A.D.3d 760, Appellate Division, First Department Sharhann Lane, had been terminated from her position with the New York City Department of Corrections. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Thus, earlier this week and with the plaintiffs’ consent, the Department of Justice asked the Court to hold the case in abeyance.Despite the high likelihood that the Supreme Court will not hear Trump v. [read post]