Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
From that moment, the long arm of the Russian State Prosecutors’ Office was visible at every twist and turn in the English court proceedings. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:13 am
” CFIT v. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 8:18 am
On 16 March 2022, the High Court of England and Wales handed down its judgment following the FRAND trial in InterDigital v Lenovo. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Roberts v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 1:02 pm
Or if you want to go back earlier, try Justice Chase's opinion in Calder v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:35 am
We now can see that United States v. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 3:22 pm
In the United States, so-called Miranda rights are named after the US Supreme Court decision of Miranda v. [read post]
3 Sep 2011, 8:22 am
S. and V. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 2:46 am
Marquez Brothers International, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 9:53 am
Sims, 12-1217, and the trio of state-on-top habeas cases, Ryan v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
The granting of declaratory relief is pragmatic and discretionary and can assist in achieving justice between the parties (see Messier-Doughty v Sabena [2001] 1 All ER 275 and Financial Services Authority v Rourke [2002] CP Rep 14; see also Nokia Corp v Interdigital [2006] EWCH Civ 1618; [2007] FSR 23). [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 4:41 am
There is thus no scope for applying English law by default. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 4:14 pm
Since the United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in New York Times v Sullivan in 1964, it has been extremely difficult for plaintiffs with any public profile to sue for defamation in the United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 3:17 am
Remember Ryanair v. [read post]
6 Apr 2008, 5:12 am
In Kaita v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 11:34 am
C-619/10, Trade Agency Ltd v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 9:55 am
United States and Alberts v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:00 pm
The 7th amendment, believe it or not, does not apply in state courts. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
The case has attracted some media attention in light of recent suggestions that English law, particularly libel law, is being abused by wealthier males to silence female accusers. [read post]
