Search for: "Graham v. State" Results 1801 - 1820 of 1,933
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Denham, who was the government’s preferred candidate, will replace outgoing Information Commissioner Christopher Graham who has served since 2009. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
For many business economists and legal academics, the purpose of any business organization is simply stated: to maximize profits. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am by Legal Beagle
  As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself:  see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9]        A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
20 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
Graham Smith has published his tweets about the draft bill on his cybereagle blog. [read post]
11 May 2010, 5:39 pm by Press Releases
The second morning panel will examine the impact of the Supreme Court’s 2006 opinion in eBay Inc. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 9:37 am
” Defendants’ use of “Imagine” is similar to the use at issue in a recent decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in which fair use was found, Blanch v. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 2:20 pm by Lydia Estep
Several categories of organizations are exempted, including state agencies and offices, nonprofits, and institutions of higher education, as well as any financial institution subject to the privacy rules of Title V of the Graham-Leach-Bliley Act and entities subject to HIPAA. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:37 am by SHG
And don’t get me started on the Reasonably Scared Cop Rule of Graham v. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 9:20 am by Elie Mystal
Avery’s response was reported on the Natural Truth by Michael Graham. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 11:33 am by Rusty Shackleford
The Supreme Court handed down a decision in the case of Graham v. [read post]