Search for: "In re Admission to Practice Law"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 2,547
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 6:03 am
Cranor, Regulating Toxic Substances: A Philosophy of Science and the Law at 33-34(Oxford 1993)(“One can think of ? [read post]
7 Sep 2021, 9:29 am
[3] The OSC issued a parallel guidance document dedicated solely to production of documents, OSC Staff Notice 15-708: https://www.osc.ca/en/securities-law/instruments-rules-policies/1/15-708/osc-staff-notice-15-708-document-production-guidance [4] OSC Staff Notice 15-702: https://www.osc.ca/sites/default/files/pdfs/irps/sn_20140311_15-702_revised-credit-coop-program.pdf [5] See for example, Re Cheng, 41 OSCB 5128, and Re Hutchinson, 2018 ONSEC 22 [read post]
5 May 2016, 3:09 pm
Sara Teichholtz, “The Differential: Half of What You’re Learning is Wrong,” (Dec. 14, 2013). [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 7:11 am
In Re Continental Insurance Company, 994 S.W.2d 423 (Tex. [read post]
7 May 2012, 11:05 am
Douglas McNabb and other members of the U.S. law firm practice and write and/or report extensively on matters involving Federal Criminal Defense, INTERPOL Red Notice Removal, International Extradition Defense, OFAC SDN Sanctions Removal, International Criminal Court Defense, and US Seizure of Non-Resident, Foreign-Owned Assets. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 10:24 am
According to NCMEC's website "there is a federal law, 18 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:48 am
If the agreement is ambiguous, (1) is an expert affidavit outlining purported industry custom and usage admissible? [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 11:37 pm
But he was denied a license to practice. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:55 am
HB 219 - Relating to the electronic recording and admissibility of certain custodial interrogations. [read post]
14 Jan 2015, 7:57 am
He began his legal career as an Assistant District Attorney before entering private practice in 2006. [read post]
14 May 2012, 11:00 am
"They have shotguns, stun guns, they have their Glocks out . . . they're trying to kill me! [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 3:49 pm
As a practical matter, when a law enforcement officer directs you to return to your vehicle, you should get in your car. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 4:21 pm
The customers allege that Comcast engaged in monopolization, attempted monopolization, and market or customer allocation through a series of acquisitions and cable system swap arrangements.The appellate court ruled that the lower court satisfied the “rigorous analysis” standard established in In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litigation (2008-2 Trade Cases ¶76,453, 552 F.3d 305) in determining that questions of fact or law common to class members predominated over… [read post]
24 May 2019, 8:38 am
AG Kokott provides some indications | Pepper gets spicy: The EPO President's Referral to the EBA | Book review: Accords de technologie / Technology Transactions | More Than Just a Game V - IP and the gaming industry | Event report: Retromark – the conference | Re-imagining Marie Louise Fuller's copyright of dance in Fuller v Bemis | Conference report: 'Injunctions and flexibility in patent law' | DSM Directive Series #3: How far does Article 14 go? [read post]
26 May 2019, 2:13 pm
AG Kokott provides some indications | Pepper gets spicy: The EPO President's Referral to the EBA | Book review: Accords de technologie / Technology Transactions | More Than Just a Game V - IP and the gaming industry | Event report: Retromark – the conference | Re-imagining Marie Louise Fuller's copyright of dance in Fuller v Bemis | Conference report: 'Injunctions and flexibility in patent law' | DSM Directive Series #3: How far does Article 14 go? [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 11:18 am
In In re Silica, the prospect of creating a mass tort out of whole cloth seems to have had just such a distorting influence.[12] As noted by Judge Jack, in making the reliability inquiry, the trial judge has the responsibility “to make certain that an expert … employs in the courtroom the same level of intellectual rigor that characterizes the practice of an expert in the relevant field. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 10:07 am
Thank each of them for their support of the bills that they’re already on and urge them to cosponsor any of the four animal protection bills being counted on the 2013 Humane Scorecard that they’re not yet cosponsoring. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 5:17 am
The context for such further analyses is usually the pretrial admissibility review for expert testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and state law equivalents.The last point that I want to make is that the Ninth Circuit got this topic exactly right early on in Daubert II (which I also recommend reading in full for an intuitive explanation of the doctrine), but got it very wrong in In re Hanford, which I admit is a bit of a personal pet peeve. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 7:37 am
“[T]he general rule is that testimony of a witness’ opinion is not admissible into evidence” People v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
What this study indicates, however, is that judges cited philosophers most often in criminal cases,[22] and only secondly in constitutional law cases.[23] Quantitatively, the third largest category was in “Civil Practice and Procedure”.[24] To assess the area of law for each case, the main subject heading assigned to each case by Carswell was used. [read post]
