Search for: "No. 337"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 4,154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2024, 11:15 am
The Federal Circuit agreed with the ITC that Zircon had failed to provide an adequate basis for evaluating its domestic industry investments by aggregating its investments into products that practiced fewer than all patents asserted by Zircon in the ITC’s Section 337 investigation. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:50 pm
No. 337-TA-789, Order No. 48 (April 24, 2012). [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 12:52 pm
Between Jan. 1 and June 30, companies brought 42 cases alleging IP infringement under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 at the ITC. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 10:29 am
No. 337-TA-694. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:07 pm
No. 337-TA-666). [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 5:40 pm
No. 337-TA-794). [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 3:12 am
SB 337 makes another change regarding child support. [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 10:23 pm
As I expected two days ago, the ITC instituted investigations of Ericsson's three ITC complaints (U.S. import ban requests) against Apple, and I do not have the slightest doubt we'll see an investigation of Apple's countercomplaint instituted any moment now, too.Ericsson's standard-essential patent (SEP) complaint (no. 337-3595) has been assigned investigation number 337-TA-1299 (PDF); non-SEP complaints nos. 337-3596 and 337-3597 have been… [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 10:01 am
No. 337-TA-756). [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 9:55 pm
Aaron Pressman of Fortune has reported that Fitbit dropped its ITC patent case against its financially-ailing competitor Jawbone.Much of the earlier wrangling had led to invalidity of various patents on both sides.Jawbone seems to be planning an antitrust claim against Fitbit; from a statement on 24 Dec 2016: "Fitbit's pursuit of these baseless claims for so long was to burden Jawbone–an issue to be raised in Jawbone's anti-trust claim against Fitbit. [read post]
1 Sep 2009, 6:55 am
No. 337-TA-670) relating to Complainant Humanscale Corp.'s ("Humanscale") motion to quash third party subpoenas to Humanscale's attorneys, Alston & Byrd LLP ("A&B") and Bryan Cave LLP ("Cave"). [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:19 pm
Section 337 assigns the ITC the authority to investigate and block importation based on unfair competition derived from patent, trademark, and copyright infringement, not the Patent Act. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 4:30 pm
No. 337-TA-501), in which he modified his previous finding of violation and determined that no violation of Section 337 had occurred. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 3:03 pm
No. 337-TA-564). [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 3:37 pm
No. 337-TA-718). [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:27 pm
No. 337-TA-692). [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 5:52 pm
No. 337-TA-777). [read post]
5 May 2008, 7:11 am
Solum (University of Illinois - College of Law) has posted Constitutional Possibilities (Indiana Law Journal, Vol. 83, pp. 307-337, 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 6:16 pm
No. 337-TA-743). [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 9:09 am
An ITC decision in a 337 case may be immediately appealed to the U.S. [read post]
