Search for: "Price v. United States" Results 1801 - 1820 of 5,300
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2016, 2:21 pm
When publisher John Wiley & Sons ("Wiley") learned about Kirtsaeng's sales in the United States at low prices, it sued Kirtsaeng for copyright infringement. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 2:21 pm
When publisher John Wiley & Sons ("Wiley") learned about Kirtsaeng's sales in the United States at low prices, it sued Kirtsaeng for copyright infringement. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:33 pm by James Yang
After an inventor conceives of an invention, an application seeking patent protection may be filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
16 Nov 2010, 8:36 am
  The federal law says that aliens not lawfully present in the United States can't get in-state tuition on the basis of residence within a state. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:12 am by Darcy Jalandoni
” Apple sought a petition of certiorari from the United States Supreme Court in October 2015. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 9:26 am
--Court: United States District Court for the District of KansasOpinion Date: 9/17/09Cite: Oldham Graphic Supply, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 2:56 am by Walter Olson
“Trump promises ‘massive permit reform’ in infrastructure bill” [Melanie Zanona, The Hill] Murr v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 9:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Because (and only because) of the allegedly false certification, the Brazilian mills can sell their wood in the United States at a far lower price point, causing major losses. [read post]
  Plaintiffs also alleged that Pacific Seafood, the largest seafood-buying company in the United States, either monopolized or attempted to monopolize west coast markets for Pacific seafood. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:30 pm
His pleadings sought “billions” of dollars for consumers throughout the United States, and asserted that the food service industry systematically deceived customers through these allegedly deceptive practices. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 12:55 pm
  Synergy Sport International, Ltd. v United States, 17 C.I.T. 18 (1993).Customs cites many difficulties with the application of the First Sale Rule as the reasons for the proposed change. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 7:55 pm
  Synergy Sport International, Ltd. v United States, 17 C.I.T. 18 (1993). [read post]