Search for: "State v. English"
Results 1801 - 1820
of 6,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2015, 4:43 am
Monegasque stamps take some licking ...Judgment was delivered today by the General Court in Case T-197/13Monaco v OHIM (not yet available in English, though you can enjoy it in Maltese, Croatian or Estonian if you like). [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 7:49 am
" He likens it (if I understand his argument) to Justice Harlan's tradition-based methodology of due process in Poe v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:53 pm
In Hameed v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 3:48 am
A more recent example is Seadrill Ghana Operations Ltd v Tullow Ghana Ltd (2018) where the court stated that when considering reasonable steps to mitigate, a party should consider the interests of both contracting parties and not just its own. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:53 am
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsuibishi UFJ Ltd v Sanko Mineral (The MV Sanko Mineral) [2014]EWHC 3927 (Admlty) Cargo Interests began proceedings in the U.S. against the Defendant former owner of the M/V SANKO MINERAL for breach of a contract of carriage. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 3:53 am
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsuibishi UFJ Ltd v Sanko Mineral (The MV Sanko Mineral) [2014]EWHC 3927 (Admlty) Cargo Interests began proceedings in the U.S. against the Defendant former owner of the M/V SANKO MINERAL for breach of a contract of carriage. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 9:01 pm
United States). [read post]
1 Sep 2007, 10:48 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 4:00 am
Carter v. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 3:07 am
Lyle Denniston previewed the case for this blog, while I did the same in Plain English. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:19 pm
A summary of the facts The case of Macatė v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
Nokia v Oppo [2023] EWHC 23 (Pat) In a new development in the global dispute between Nokia and Oppo that spans seven jurisdictions across Europe and Asia, Mr Justice Meade of the English Patents Court has found that smartphone manufacturer Oppo infringes valid and standard essential Nokia 4G/5G patent EP2981103 on an “allocation of preamble sequences”. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:34 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2018, 1:44 pm
Clinton v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 10:12 am
Oregon and Johnson v. [read post]
2 Nov 2007, 3:05 pm
And their English forebears were at odds over that issue even before the reign of Charles II in the middle 1600s. [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:54 am
He also stated that there is no public interest in the legal sense in the disclosure of private sexual encounters even if they involve infidelity or more than one person at the same time. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 7:55 pm
On September 9, 2008, the Third Circuit issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
