Search for: "Application of State of California" Results 1821 - 1840 of 18,179
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2022, 8:00 am by Nassiri Law
At the state-level, we have the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA), the Unruh Civil Rights Act, and the Disabled Persons Act all protect workers from disability-based discrimination. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 10:04 am by Sarah Woolston
In 2018, the FMCSA issued an order stating that the federal hours-of-service regulations preempted, or trumped, California meal and rest break rules, meaning the hours-of-service requirements would apply in place of California laws for certain truck drivers. [read post]
4 May 2011, 5:56 am by Lauren Ellerman
California law finds employee non-competes to be against public policy. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 4:55 pm
In 1994 the voters in California passed Proposition 184, enacting the Three Strikes Statute for the first time in this state. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 9:10 pm by Stephanie Poli
SB 897 would mandate that following a declared state of emergency, insurers would offer policyholders a settlement equal to 80 percent of their contents coverage without requiring them to submit a detailed inventory, applicable to claims filed July... [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 4:33 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
” Monsanto additionally provided evidence regarding the August 2019 letter from EPA to glyphosate registrants that it would not permit label amendments to include warnings under California’s Proposition 65 that glyphosate is known to the State of California to cause cancer. [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:37 pm by Chris Koszo
The legal standard for negligence in car accidents is slightly different depending on which state you are in. [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:37 pm by Chris Koszo
The legal standard for negligence in car accidents is slightly different depending on which state you are in. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 9:29 am
Needless to say, this caused the state of California enough concern to take the case to the U.S. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 1:15 pm
A felony arson or "reckless burning" violation of California Penal Code Section 451 or 452 carries a maximum penalty of one and a half to nine years in a state prison and a $50,000 fine. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 8:26 am by Moseley Collins
This past May, we celebrated Motorcycle Safety Awareness Month in California, but this is really a topic that is applicable all year round. [read post]
California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”) prohibits harassment and discrimination in the workplace that is based on one or more of the categories commonly protected by local, state and federal discrimination laws. [read post]
Of course, it isn’t exhaustive, and you must remain current on other applicable state, county, and local health department guidance. [read post]
1 Sep 2011, 6:10 am by Medicare Set Aside Services
In response to a Petition for Reconsideration, the WCJ explained that she declined to approve Addendum B because she did not have jurisdiction to limit Medicare’s recourse against the defendant, applicant or their counsel, based on an understanding or agreement between defendant and applicant. [read post]
On November 27, 2023, the California Privacy Protection Agency (“CPPA”) released a first draft of rules for automated decision-making technologies under California’s privacy law. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 12:52 am by Chris Manes
How much weight each item brings to the residency ledger isn’t easily parsed by reviewing applicate law or the facts. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 11:00 am by Sarah Andropoulos
Depending on which state you practice in, it may be relatively clear that your law firm’s website is considered attorney advertising under the applicable rules of professional responsibility, and is therefore subject to regulation by your state bar. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
By Matthew Hinks The well-known "nexus" and "rough proportionality" tests from the United States Supreme Court's opinions in Nollan v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
”In dealing with Hawke, the Court observed that in Article V, a legislature is making an up–down ratification decision, whereas under the Elections Clause, a legislature is passing generally applicable laws to govern the process of congressional elections. [read post]