Search for: "Does 1-27"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 11,130
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jan 2014, 9:54 pm
On 1/27/14 the United States Supreme Court decided Burrage v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 7:45 am
” OCGA § 33–7–11(a)(1)(B). [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 6:48 am
As a result, it concluded that the trade mark should be declared invalid under Article 59(1)(b). [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 11:48 pm
Patent No. 6,847,959: claims 24, 25, 27(remaining Siri-style unified-search patent)U.S. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 2:52 pm
The Court ruled that Penal Law §70.25(1)(a) provides, in relevant part, as follows: "1. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 6:48 pm
” Id. at 1:27–30. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 8:35 am
NOTES[1] “Good governance has 8 major characteristics. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
Section 68.2(1) does not provide a collective infringement remedy.[8] The result was that the Supreme Court found that Access Copyright could not enforce its tariffs against non-licensees, such as York, and, further, since Access Copyright does not have an assignment of copyright from the copyright owners, Access Copyright could not sue York for any alleged infringement. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 5:00 am
Id. at *1. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 3:31 pm
How does a divorce get dismissed in Illinois? [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 3:31 pm
How does a divorce get dismissed in Illinois? [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 12:03 pm
Does this mean, however, that if the parent earns income of a million dollars, the child is entitled to that much as ‘child support’? [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:28 am
App. 1, 13, 707 S.E.2d 724, 733 (2011). [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 1:00 am
The Patentee had amended the description and claims of the patent post-grant (Section 27, UKPA). [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 1:04 pm
1. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:44 pm
Mayer’s report sometime shortly after January 27, 2015. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 10:31 am
To set up a consultation to learn more about us, please contact us online or call us toll-free at 1-877-990-4990. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 9:46 pm
The fact that a judgment given by the courts of a Member State, concerning land situated in an area of that State over which its Government does not exercise effective control, cannot, as a practical matter, be enforced where the land is situated does not constitute a ground for refusal of recognition or enforcement under Article 34(1) of Regulation No 44/2001 and it… [read post]
4 May 2011, 9:31 pm
Dept. of Transp. (2002) 27 Cal.4th 198, 212, footnote 3? [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 8:18 pm
Sub-section (27) of section 2 of the Act reads as follows: "`member', in relation to a company, does not include a bearer of a share- warrant of the company issued in pursuance of section 114. [read post]
