Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2015, 4:00 am
Guindon v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
Bernard v. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 9:28 am
United States of America) (Mexico v. [read post]
18 May 2016, 9:59 am
Spokeo, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 4:23 pm
This post concerns the Opinion of the Advocate General in Case C-362/14: Schrems v. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 11:31 am
Let's see what the Secretary for State says.Something to read? [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 12:40 am
Meade J has also stated that any decision the court makes on the FRAND royalty amount the iPhone maker must pay would apply worldwide, not just to its UK sales (in line with the UK Supreme Court decision last year in Unwired Planet v Huawei). [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 7:28 pm
The seminal Florida case defining the dangerous instrumentality doctrine is Southern Cotton Oil Co. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 6:15 am
Enriquez v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 3:46 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 11:01 pm
Ahmed & Anor v R [2011] EWCA Crim 184 (25 February 2011) – Read judgment “Torture is wrong”. [read post]
31 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
For this last week, the three most-consulted English-language decisions were: 1. [read post]
30 Apr 2016, 1:01 am
Plessy v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:06 pm
Assange v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 9:30 pm
Barron v. [read post]
18 Dec 2006, 1:12 pm
" Judge Berzon, dissenting, begins her opinion this way: "The majority's peculiar interpretation of the word 'reasonableness' not only defies its common usage in the English language, but more importantly, runs contrary to what this court decided, sitting en banc, in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:56 pm
(Fisher v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm
This morning brought decisions in both of the patent cases argued in November, with the government prevailing on the constitutional question raised in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
