Search for: "Figures v. Figures"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 15,512
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2020, 3:05 pm
In People v. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:24 am
And both sides agreed that in the Fifth Circuit, once the Court calculates the lodestar, it must then contemplate adjusting the figure upwards or downwards according to factors explained in Johnson v. [read post]
16 May 2018, 11:21 am
The following figures, beginning with the petitioners’ figure, use data from the 1946 through 2016 terms. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 2:46 pm
I couldn't figure why people were making such a big deal out of this whole thing; jury trial, appeal to the appellate division, onto the Court of Appeal, etc. [read post]
4 Jul 2014, 5:00 am
In SEC v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 9:26 pm
Go figure. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 1:26 pm
Nintendo is sure to argue that the independent claims read on any motion sensor system, and Nintendo was not the first to use such a system (although Nintendo was arguably the first to "successfully" incorporate such a system into a popular game console, which is why they are being sued).Here is a representative figure from the patent:The case is Motiva, LLC v. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 1:22 pm
Philips Corp. v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 3:38 am
In State v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:41 am
Okularity * Copyright Plaintiffs Can’t Figure Out What Copyrights They Own, Court Says ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ * A 512(f) Case Leads to a Rare Damages Award (on a Default Judgment)–California Beach v. [read post]
15 Sep 2024, 9:11 am
Okularity * Copyright Plaintiffs Can’t Figure Out What Copyrights They Own, Court Says ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ * A 512(f) Case Leads to a Rare Damages Award (on a Default Judgment)–California Beach v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 7:19 am
" The Board interpreted Bose Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 7:41 am
Perhaps federal sentencing practitioners both inside and outside the Sixth Circuit can help me figure this out. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 9:23 pm
US v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 3:11 am
Since PJS, and now also since Sir Cliff Richard v BBC, a new path appears to be being forged for privacy and freedom of expression. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 10:00 am
My concerns with Kelly v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 1:30 pm
The Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Mar 2013, 3:02 pm
“Something more” must be required to lose immunity under the 512(c)(1)(B), it concluded; but it could not determine exactly what it was, and remanded to the district court to figure it out. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 12:40 pm
US v. [read post]
