Search for: "People v Davis"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 2,038
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2017, 5:19 am
” The closest the law comes to authorizing a federal agency that they have any business in college students’ pants is Davis v. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 8:08 am
DESAI (UW Law) In Bostock v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 9:55 am
Nomination of Directors Last year's AFSCME v. [read post]
13 Sep 2017, 5:30 am
The correct quote from Davis v. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 1:41 pm
From medical files that I have reviewed recently it seems that once experts have identified that there are toxic substances in a particular neighborhood or environment, people come forward with a long list of complaints and medical histories alleging that the exposure caused some, most or all of the illnesses. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 4:01 pm
Aldrich Ames--traitor Benedict Arnold--traitor John Wilkes Booth--killed our greatest President, contender for #1 on my list if rank ordered James Buchanan--feckless President whose inaction allowed the Southern rebellion to get off the ground Aaron Burr--traitor and murderer of Hamilton Robert Byrd--KKK member and the worst pork politician in history, plus an insufferable prig Jefferson Davis--leader of the traitorous Southern rebels Louis Farrakhan--race hate monger Nathan… [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in West Virginia v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 7:05 am
[1] See United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 12:04 am
The judges restated their positions in additional detail on Tuesday -- only this time Bybee was writing in dissent as Graber penned the 8-7 majority opinion in a strikingly contentious en banc case, in Doe v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 7:54 am
Carolyn v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:25 am
Davis. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
The more political and personal preferences are involved, and the greater the complexity of the underlying scientific analysis, the more we should expect people, historians, judges, and juries, to ignore the Royal Society’s Nullius in verba,” and to rely upon the largely irrelevant factors of reputation. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:01 pm
At Balkinization, guest blogger Sharon Dolovich explains why the Supreme Court’s Farmer v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 8:09 am
Fletcher is a well-known investor – So was Bernie – and even people who are honest can get way overextended. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm
Celebrezze and Burdick v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
University of Texas and its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
” In challenging this federal directive, San Francisco relies on principles of federalism as expounded in Printz v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm
.) ———————————— Analysis If there is a surprise in the Supreme Court’s agreement to take on the constitutional controversy over the new federal health care law, it is the Court’s willingness to rule on Congress’s power to broadly expand the right of poor people to health care benefits under the federal-state program called “Medicaid.” In that review, the Court will be… [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 12:25 pm
The jury never saw the V-Plot video. [read post]
