Search for: "People v. Bear" Results 1821 - 1840 of 5,251
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2012, 1:37 pm by jleaming@acslaw.org
The plot (or facts) in this case bears no resemblance to the movie. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 6:43 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
He raised for the first time on appeal an argument under the Second Amendment, you know, the one that says you have the right to bear arms in a public restaurant. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:25 am
Big Bend National Park is at the apex of the bend in the river, but only encompasses a small part of the area bearing its name. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 7:35 am
In my job as a Syracuse and Central New York car accident attorney, I personally have noticed a big increase in the number of cross-over and rear-end collisions due to young people texting while driving within the last few years. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 4:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
In the post-Heller world, as in the post-Brown v. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 3:42 pm
In that case, the Seventh Circuit concluded that the Second Amendment's individual right to keep and bear arms is not incorporated against the states. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 4:16 pm
As a practical matter on the Court, the outcome in D.C. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 8:13 am by Amir Efrati
Since we declared our affection for McDonald v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 7:26 am
This is a good place to acknowledge the great labours expended by V. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 10:28 am by Hilf & Hilf, PLC
  Under Michigan case law (People v Koon) it is not illegal for individual who is legally allowed to use marijuana to drive with marijuana in their system, as long as the driver is not under the influence of marijuana. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 9:54 am by mdkeenan
In People v Taylor, the officer essentially placed the PBT device in front of defendant’s mouth without asking the defendant to take the test or giving the defendant enough time to refuse. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 11:00 am by Katherine Franke
“Sex, like, race is a visible, immutable characteristic bearing no necessary relationship to ability,” she advised the court in her oral argument in Frontiero v. [read post]