Search for: "People v. Mays" Results 1821 - 1840 of 40,100
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2012, 8:25 am
Class actions are a type of action that most people have heard of but that may not be well understood. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Brian Shiffrin
People v Black (_ NY3d_, 2010 NY Slip Op 08766 [11/3010]) is one of the four cases with Batson issues that the Court considered in People v Hecker. [read post]
2 Mar 2014, 3:59 pm
Further, to admit the results of the Intoxilyzer 5000EN, which is conducted at the precinct, the People must show that the devise was properly calibrated, generally within about a six month period as held in People v Boscic. [read post]
13 May 2011, 8:52 am by gstasiewicz
“The American people have a right to know, by law, basic information about the killing of Osama bin Laden. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 7:44 pm
Here is the abstract:Hoffman v. [read post]
26 Apr 2013, 5:14 pm by INFORRM
The permanent damage that internet publications can inflict is very much the focus of Tugendhat J’s assessment of damages in the case of ZAM v CFW & Anor [2013] EWHC 662 (QB), encapsulated in the memorable description he quoted in an earlier judgment: “what is to be found on the internet may become like a tattoo“. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 3:32 pm by Stephen Bilkis
While the list may seem formidable, law enforcement agencies have a choice of routes. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 7:59 am by Eric Goldman
The court engages the seminal question: are people searching for “Comphy” exclusively seeking the manufacturer? [read post]