Search for: "Price v. State" Results 1821 - 1840 of 11,975
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2014, 7:43 am by Charlotte Bamford, Olswang LLP
 The Court cited Article 249 EC which states that ‘a decision shall be binding in its entirety upon those to whom it is addressed’ and the case of AssiDomän Kraft Products AB v Commission of the European Communities [1999] ECR I-5363 (Case C-310/97). [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 7:25 pm by Jim Lindgren
Second, Alexander Hamilton himself said in his brief for the United States in Hylton v. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 12:00 am
For instance, in Centrafam v Sterling case [(1976) F.S.R. 164], the real beneficiary was the parallel importer who sold the drug nalidixic acid (Negram) twice the price in England, not the final consumer or the patent holder. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:32 pm by Joshua Matz
Today’s petition of the day is: Title: Cook v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 9:05 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Contract Law Opinions Body: Auto Glass Express, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am by Peter Mahler
Folks who’ve been following this blog for years know that periodically I like to venture beyond New York’s borders to find and report on interesting decisions from other states in business divorce cases. [read post]
30 May 2017, 4:05 pm by Larry
This is the rule of exhaustion.In Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 2:22 pm
The State "remains immune from negligence claims arising out of governmental functions such as police protection unless a special relationship with a person creates a specific duty to protect, and that person relies on performance of that duty" (Price v New York City Hous. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 7:05 am by Elie Mystal
By way of example, the state passage rate for the July 2009 New York State bar exam was 72%. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 5:32 pm
Third party challengers can seemingly inflict stock-price drop through an efficient patent invalidation mechanism provided at the United States Patent and Trademark Office, while betting against the targeted company’s stock price. [read post]