Search for: "State v. B. W." Results 1821 - 1840 of 4,254
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2012, 4:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) Scott Johnson (PowerLine) reports on this very interesting case (United States v. $35,131.00 in United States Currency (S.D. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 2:40 am by Susan Brenner
In the United States, the venue is either a county (for cases in state court) or a district or division (for cases in federal court). [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 10:06 am by Neil Rosenbaum
The court first held that Rule 23(b)(3)’s requirement that common issues of law or fact predominate was not met because “each class member’s claim would be governed by the law of the State in which he made the challenged purchase, and the differences between the consumer-protection laws of the many affected States would cast a long shadow over any common issues of fact plaintiffs might establish. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 8:42 am by Benjamin Herbst
The federal government is responsible for maintaining and policing the B-W Parkway, and therefore territorial jurisdiction is satisfied. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
  and added that `[b]y attaching the [GPS] device to the Jeep, officers encroached on a protected area. . . [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Brennan Center for Justice, Andrew Cohen maintains that “[w]hat Justice Gorsuch and the rest of the Court’s conservatives are saying” in Bucklew v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:59 pm
Each post in this Year in Review series features a different federal courthouse in each state of the Union. [read post]