Search for: "United States v. Edwards"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 2,102
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2022, 2:20 pm
" … In defense of the revocation, the State invokes Fordyce v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 10:22 pm
” Next up is likelihood of success on the merits: Judge Leon reviews the metadata program through the prism of a subjective expectation of privacy (think Katz), rather than a physical intrusion (United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 11:59 am
In Tinker v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:35 pm
It is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Jason P. [read post]
21 May 2010, 11:40 am
Nor is it unlikely that the result of such enemy litigiousness would be a conflict between judicial and military opinion highly comforting to enemies of the United States. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 1:35 pm
It is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Jason P. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:38 am
Edwards. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 7:51 am
Dustin was still Chair at the time and my friend Kate Edwards was coming on as the new Executive Director. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
Rates of C. difficile, the most common hospital-based infection in the United States, continue to climb. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 4:49 am
There should however be a little notice somewhere to the effect that its contents are essentially United States-derived and United States-oriented. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 9:16 am
What does Invisible Man say about the culture of the United States on the eve of Brown? [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:16 pm
Banning the use of confidential sources denies a core principle reflected in media ethics codes from around the world and flies in the face of the First Amendment to the United States constitution and rights to free speech. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 10:55 am
LAW LIBRARY level 3: KD810 .M63 v. 7Elizabeth Cooke, ed., Modern Studies in Property Law (Oxford: Hart Pub., 2013). [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:24 am
KF 228 J57 W38 2012 Buying America from the Indians : Johnson v. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 8:55 am
United States; Jess Bravin of the Journal was there, too. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 9:04 am
In February, in the case of Clapper v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
