Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 6,912
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2008, 12:28 pm
Her article, published in the North Carolina Law Review in January 2007, says that pro se defendants don't do significantly worse than defendants who are represented by lawyers -- and in some respects they do better. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:45 am
They don’t count the hours or watch the clock, and they are fulfilled by pursuit of their love. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 6:24 am
Anyhow, t-shirts and tank tops don’t substitute for the original photographs. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 9:18 am
In light of past underenforcement, it's obvious that competition "watchdogs" don't just want to wave this $69 billion purchase of a major game maker by one of the largest Big Tech players through: they must take a closer look. [read post]
2 May 2008, 3:02 am
We don't mean that as criticism. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 3:54 pm
But my word, when we're talking about the interpretation of the Constitution of the United States, we don't want someone who has an attitude of harshness. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 1:43 pm
(The Commissioners don't exactly look thrilled at the news.) [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 12:40 am
Like Orin Kerr at Volokh, I still don't see that this is a big issue because the military has always had its own rules and never has factored into 8th Amendment evolving standards cases. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 3:45 am
And don't think for a second that we can't see the jurors shifting about in their seats, desperate to get out of the box. [read post]
3 Sep 2022, 11:57 am
We have to defend it, protect it, stand up for it, each and every one of us. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 12:30 pm
So I don't understand why he would have gone to this extent to get attention, if that's what you want to call it, if that's why he did it. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 3:29 am
I'm not saying that what Apple demands isn't possible under U.S. patent law: unfortunately, it could happen, especially since invalidations resulting from reexamination proceedings don't have retroactive effect with respect to damage awards in previously-concluded cases. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 5:06 pm
it makes the difference because it provides information perspective that the briefs don't and can't contain.Well, maybe. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 am
You don't need to slam Judge Cooke for her "power play," whatever that means. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 8:40 am
They weren't angels. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm
In fact, there is historic precedent for that, though it's rare.Here we go--a couple of hours ago, Continental brought a motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO), asking Judge Lucy H. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 3:26 pm
If, as here, you don't have any special information that differentiates your deadlocked jury from the usual deadlocked jury, what's the right call? [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 2:00 pm
It doesn’t need to sound perfect, and you don’t need to be an expert on patents. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:30 am
We don’t have that here. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 8:24 am
Perhaps repeat defendants view private lawyers who serve as class counsel and public interest groups such as Public Citizen as a monolith, but class counsel don't view the world in that way. [read post]
