Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 1821 - 1840
of 6,886
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2010, 6:38 pm
Sure, they say it is, and the rules and caselaw even agree with them, but prosecutors don't know any better than the rest of us—which is to say "at all"—what justice is, and if they don't know what justice is, they can't seek it. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 1:30 pm
We generally don't take kids away from their father because their mother "left [father] and their children" and only "initiat[ed] contact when she needed money or was in trouble. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 12:30 pm
So I don't understand why he would have gone to this extent to get attention, if that's what you want to call it, if that's why he did it. [read post]
13 May 2015, 9:49 pm
But jurors just don't like self-important "assisting creeps". [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:45 am
They don’t count the hours or watch the clock, and they are fulfilled by pursuit of their love. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 8:40 am
They weren't angels. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 12:37 pm
Yeah, courts don't work that way. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 12:37 pm
Yeah, courts don't work that way. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 3:29 am
I'm not saying that what Apple demands isn't possible under U.S. patent law: unfortunately, it could happen, especially since invalidations resulting from reexamination proceedings don't have retroactive effect with respect to damage awards in previously-concluded cases. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 3:32 am
Don't fret. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 11:39 am
Anything they didn't reach we don't need.II. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 7:33 pm
When Thompson made the point that the Preamble to Section 4 of the Rules allows for a harmonization of our roles in society with the role of lawyer, Tunis recoiled, stating derisively, Don't enlist me into your culture war! [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 3:53 am
Take a look at Bailey v Monaco Coach (ND Ga 2004), 350 F.Supp.2d 1036.And when the defendant argues that the recall is hearsay, don't forget that you can argue that it is actually admissible as an admission by the defendant so it isn't really hearsay at all. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 7:34 am
But the fact that we've done it doesn't make it right. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 7:02 am
We know we will be fighting tooth and nail to explain to the judge and jury why the evidence should be excluded or ignored. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 3:13 pm
At one point the paper discusses the average verdict for defendants (more than $800,000) which is confusing since defendants shouldn't win any damages. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 7:07 am
But I don't feel nearly so bad for him as I did for my last murder defendant. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 3:26 pm
If, as here, you don't have any special information that differentiates your deadlocked jury from the usual deadlocked jury, what's the right call? [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 8:12 am
(The Ohio River isn't the Atlantic, and Cincinnati doesn't have too many whalers docking in its ports.) [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 7:34 am
We know the language, so don't waste our time. [read post]
