Search for: "Word v. U. S" Results 1821 - 1840 of 2,468
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2014, 6:03 am by Gustavo Arballo
Si pagare en cualquier momento lo que le reste cumplir de pena de multa, cesará la prisión.Cuando sin culpa grave del condenado variaren significativamente sus condiciones económicas, su capacidad de pago o su renta real, el juez podrá adecuar el monto del día de multa fijado en la sentencia a las nuevas circunstancias (art. 35.4 PCP).Multa como pena conjunta latenteAparece en el art. 34 inc. 6 PCP una habilitación genérica de la multa como pena… [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 12:46 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Supreme Court’s decision last month in the Morrison v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 2:27 pm
In fact, the issue was of such concern that baseball’s Safety and Health Advisory Committee was convened to study the problem and issue recommendations, including, if deemed appropriate, banning the use of maple bats. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:39 pm by Ron Coleman
Kurtz, “The Methuselah Factor: When Characters Outlive Their Copyrights,” 11 U. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 3:20 am by Peter Mahler
Huang v Northern Star Management LLC, 2016 NY Slip Op 32194(U) [Sup Ct NY County Oct. 24, 2016]. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:40 am
It contains, among other things, articles on (i) the US Supreme Court’s damages analysis in Lucent v Microsoft from an economist’s perspective which proposes new guidelines for evaluating patent damages in concentrated, high tech industries and (ii) the evolution of quilts from utility items to works of art proposing strong copyright law protection for quilt designs. [read post]
8 Mar 2009, 8:17 am
In AIG, the complaint supported an assertion that the insiders led, in Vice Chancellor Strine's words, a "criminal organization. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 3:12 am by Peter Mahler
Emerson (pictured above) in a case called Federico v Brancato, 2014 NY Slip Op 50902(U) [Sup Ct, Suffolk County June 9, 2014]. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am by Robert B. Milligan
The Third Circuit found otherwise, reasoning that the district court’s interpretation of the word “use” was “inconsistent with the text of the DTSA and the broad meaning that courts have attributed to the term ‘use’ under state laws that address trade secret misappropriation. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:46 pm by Edward A. Fallone
  The word “regulate” means “to direct” or “to command. [read post]