Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE" Results 1841 - 1860 of 6,447
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2021, 3:06 pm by Michel-Adrien
Santa apparently managed to get himself into a spot of trouble here in Canada but a court decision wisely spared him:"Santa’s largesse got him in trouble in Community Fundraising Corp. v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 6:33 am
From "1,000+ people rally in Downtown Madison to protest seemingly-imminent overturn of Roe v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 1:43 am
  The cross-licence is governed by the laws of the state of California. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 2:40 pm
 Merpel has an English version of his interview by Juve, a German review for lawyers, translated into English. [read post]
4 May 2021, 1:42 am by Florian Mueller
In November 2020, the Dusseldorf Regional Court decided to refer to the Luxembourg-based Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) two sets of legal questions: one about the component-level licensing of standard-essential patents (SEPs) and another about the application of the Huawei v. [read post]
1 Oct 2022, 11:40 am by Larry
The Supreme Court stated in United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 7:42 am by Charles Kotuby
Contents include several topics of interest to the intersection of private international law with commercial and investor state arbitration, including: Hong-Lin Yu, How far can party autonomy be stretched in setting the grounds for the refusal of arbitral awards? [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 8:08 am
Although not an English the New South Wales Court of Appeal decision of Provident Capital Ltd v Papa [2013] NSWCA provides timely guidance in relation to a Court’s position on the obligations placed on conveyancing solicitors in relation to lending practices. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:00 am by Dan Tench
  But, he stated, the criminal offence of conspiracy is a continuing offence. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am by Rachel Sachs
Other coverage continued to focus on some of the other amicus briefs filed in Hollingsworth and United States v. [read post]