Search for: "TAYLOR v. TAYLOR" Results 1841 - 1860 of 4,359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2017, 6:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Taylor in order to “end the cycle of violence” on the reservation. . . . [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 9:42 am by Bruce Nye
  In 2003, a California Appellate Court held that, even if the plaintiff cannot recover damages from the Navy, the Navy is an entity to whom the jury can allocate “fault” (Taylor v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 6:01 am by Jonathan H. Adler
If one goes back to see how Madison Cawthorn and Marjorie Taylor Greene handed the challenges to their eligibility back in 2022, it was a very different strategy. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 11:06 am by INFORRM
Her Honour commenced by exploring the potential for a cause of action to develop at the common law and embarked on a self-described ‘whistlestop tour’ through the history of privacy protection in Australia ([266]), traversing the decision of Victoria Park Racing & Recreation Grounds Co Ltd v Taylor (1937) 58 CLR 479 that was seen to deny any further development until the arrival of Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208… [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 4:01 am
Compelling arbitration in cases where the grievance is based on the unilateral act or omission of a third partyRemsen CSD v Remsen Teachers Asso., 270 AD2d 796 [Decided with In re Mohawk Central School District, 270 AD2d 798]In Richfield Springs CSD v Allen, 270 AD2d 734, the Appellate Division, Third Department, held that the fact that a third party provides the employer’s negotiated fringe benefit does not insulate the employer from its duty to negotiate changes in the… [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 7:48 pm
As set forth below the two dissenting Justices would have corrected the illegality by ordering the sentences to run concurrently:As noted by the majority, the sentence in this case was imposed pursuant to a plea agreement, but we have in the past modified a judgment on the ground that the bargained-for sentence was illegal because consecutive sentences were not permissible and have directed that the sentences run concurrently (see People v Taylor, 197 AD2d 858). [read post]
5 Jan 2007, 7:00 am
The predicate priors can include generic burglary convictions, as defined by the Supreme Court in Taylor. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:32 am
” In Walden PERB observed that the Taylor Law agreement was silent as to such payments and found that they had been extended to disabled officers “only pursuant to a practice developed over time. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 3:22 am
Statute of limitations not stayed when pursuing another remedyLevine v Board of Education, 272 AD2d 328Sometimes an individual will file a grievance in accordance with the grievance procedure set out in a collective bargaining agreement rather than immediately initiate a lawsuit on the assumption that he or she can file the lawsuit later. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 3:28 am
Name clearing hearingsOrtiz v Ward, 546 NY2d 624The Appellate Division, 1st Department, was asked to consider the issue of the right of a probationer discharged after the employer determines that he or she has not satisfactorily completed his or her probationary period to either (1) a "pre-termination hearing" before being discharged or (2) a “name-clearing hearing" following his or her termination.As to the right to a "pre-termination hearing," the Court said… [read post]