Search for: "V D"
Results 1841 - 1860
of 76,323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2024, 2:30 pm
[d.] [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 11:31 am
According to its CRD/Broker report, Edward Jones, also known as Edward D. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:40 am
That the petitioner has the ability and motivation to drive safely and within the law. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 10:20 am
Trademark Office issued the following 159 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in December 2023 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys: Registration Number Wordmark 7243847 COACH SHARON 7256270 AMBRE BLENDS ALPHA 7256110 HOOSIERS FOR GOOD 7256111 H HOOSIERS FOR GOOD 7249674 THE HOT ROOM NOW 7249852 BEXA360 7250904 BAM 7250905 BAM SHEET 7252674 CHIP MONKEYS INC. 7241101 BONUSBOX 7237423 DEALER$ ANONYMOU$ 7252488 DAVID EDWARD… [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:44 am
[18] FAR 31.201-6(e)(2); see also Raytheon Co. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:42 am
IAC/Interactivecorp, No. 1:18-cv-00366-WCB, 2020 WL 1043974, at *8 (D. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:29 am
Esta reciente sentencia aborda el caso, comentado en su día, relativo a la exclusión de un interesado de un procedimiento competitivo por no constar el registro y firma de su solicitud por vía telemática, pese a haber abonado la tasa. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am
Then, after the November election, there’d be at least two possible scenarios, depending on whether Trump finishes first among voters in states with more than 269 electoral votes. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:07 am
Cyrus D. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:37 am
In Christie v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 5:53 am
In Sharp v Ferrante Law Firm, 2023 NY Slip Op 05383 [220 AD3d 587], October 24, 2023the Appellate Division, First Department found that there was no collateral estoppel, but nevertheless, the case was untimely. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
., Search and Seizure § 4.10(d). [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 3:00 am
In Johannessen v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 8:35 pm
In End Citizens United PAC v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 2:10 pm
Health & Safety Code § 25249.7(d)(1) [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 10:58 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:50 am
., U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 4:53 am
The Soriano case, which refers to “Farmers Insurance Company v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 4:53 am
The Soriano case, which refers to “Farmers Insurance Company v. [read post]
